answersLogoWhite

0

The Supreme Court of the United States has the final rule on the establishment clause. The SCOTUS was established in 1789.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What was the outcome of Argentina and dirty war in 1976?

The military junta that prosecuted it was discredited by its defeat in the Falkland Islands war and it transitioned to a re-establishment of democratic civilian rule.


What is the Doctrine of Finality?

Finality doctrine refers to a rule relating to administrative law which states that a federal court will not judicially review an administrative agency's action until that agencies decision is final. The rule is also known as final-order doctrine; doctrine of finality or principle of finality


Why was the English Parliament concerned about James the second rule?

The English Parliament was concerned about James II's rule primarily due to his overt Catholicism and attempts to promote religious tolerance for Catholics, which threatened the Protestant establishment. His actions, including the appointment of Catholics to positions of power and his disregard for parliamentary authority, raised fears of absolute monarchy and a return to Catholic dominance. These tensions ultimately led to the Glorious Revolution of 1688, resulting in James's ousting and the establishment of William and Mary as co-sovereigns, reinforcing Protestant rule.


Why is the declaration of independence called birth certificate?

The Declaration of Independence is often referred to as America's "birth certificate" because it marks the formal establishment of the United States as a separate nation, distinct from British rule. By proclaiming sovereignty and outlining fundamental rights, the document symbolizes the nation's founding principles and ideals. Just as a birth certificate records the identity and origin of an individual, the Declaration signifies the beginning of the United States' identity and existence as an independent entity.


What would have happened if the constitutional convention failed?

The country would be without the establishment of the rule of law, the creation of a federal system with a supreme national government, the separation of governmental powers into three branches that check and balance each other, its flexibility and the establishment of a republican form of government. These concepts and ideas would simply not exist.

Related Questions

When did Re-establishment of British rule on the Falkland Islands happen?

Re-establishment of British rule on the Falkland Islands happened in 1833.


What oes the free exercise clause state?

The free exercise clause is located in the First Amendment. The original text is, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." (emphasis added).The original intent of the free exercise clause was to protect the government from taking over or getting involved in a person's religion.


What is business entity principle?

According to business entity rule of basic accounting principles "Business itself is a separate entity then it's owners or shareholders and both are not same.


How did the death of Gracici brothers change Rome politics?

It marked the beginning of the Civil wars and its final settlement a century later in the establishment of imperial rule to solve ongoing contests for power between the aristocrats.


What is entity intergrity rule?

The entity integrity rule is a fundamental principle in relational database design that ensures each table has a primary key, which uniquely identifies each record. This rule mandates that the primary key cannot contain null values, ensuring that every record can be distinctly identified. By enforcing entity integrity, databases maintain consistency and reliability in data retrieval and manipulation. This rule helps prevent duplicate entries and enhances data integrity within the database.


Statements about the HIPAA Security Rule are true?

A covered entity must have an established complaint process


How does An incidential use or disclosure is not a violation of the hipaa privacy rule if the covered entity has what?

all the above


An incidental use or disclosure is a violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule if the covered entity?

Physical safeguards are


An incidental use or disclosure is not a violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule if the covered entity has what?

all the above


Who were the targets of the grandfather clause?

A grandfather clause is a provision when an old rule continues to apply to some existing situations while the new rule will apply to all future cases. Those exempt from the new rule are said to have grandfather rights or acquired rights. Slaves were the target because the old rule found they weren't citizens and couldn't vote, so it was applied to a new law.


Which two freedoms guaranteed in the bill of right apply to this situation?

First Amendment - Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petitionCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.The Establishment Clause is the first of several pronouncements in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, stating, "Congressshall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Together with the Free Exercise Clause ("... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"), these two clauses make up what are called the "religion clauses" of the First Amendment.[1]The establishment clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference by the U.S. government of one religion over another. The first approach is called the "separation" or "no aid" interpretation, while the second approach is called the "non-preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation. The accommodation interpretation prohibits Congress from preferring one religion over another, but does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.The Free Exercise Clause is the accompanying clause with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause together read:" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... " In 1878, the Supreme Court was first called to interpret the extent of the Free Exercise Clause in Reynolds v. United States, as related to the prosecution of polygamy under federal law. The Supreme Court upheld Reynolds' conviction for bigamy, deciding that to do otherwise would provide constitutional protection for a gamut of religious beliefs, including those as extreme as human sacrifice. The Court said (at page 162): "Congress cannot pass a law for the government of the Territory which shall prohibit the free exercise of religion. The first amendment to the Constitution expressly forbids such legislation." Of federal territorial laws, the Court said: "Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices."Jehovah's Witnesses were often the target of such restriction. Several cases involving the Witnesses gave the Court the opportunity to rule on the application of the Free Exercise Clause. Subsequently, the Warren Court adopted an expansive view of the clause, the "compelling interest" doctrine (whereby a state must show a compelling interest in restricting religion-related activities), but later decisions have reduced the scope of this interpretation.PS Wikipedia is an awesome tool.


Incidental use or disclosure is not a violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule if the covered entity (CE) has?

all the above