In actuallity they should not, but some will so others have to as a deterent.
Internationalism should be pursed to a high extent because it promotes cooperation, peace, and security between nations. Nations are brought together by internationalism. To the extent that it serves the well being of your nation. A nation is sovereign in the world. In a democracy the welfare of the citizens is utmost in interest of the leadership. If an international position serves the purposes of the citizens it should be pursued. If not it should not be pursued. It is not a one-size-fits-all answer.
They have been used but only to a limited extent. The difficulty is acquiring them and handling them safely. There is also the problem of transportation to the target. They require much more detailed knowledge than conventional weapons.
abcdefg
Effect of Hinduism on Buddhism changed Buddhism to some extent. Also abduction of Tibet by china & destruction of Buddhist ancient buildings led to important changes.
Imperialism was successful starting in the 1500's to the middle part of the 20th century because the industrialized nations of Europe, including the Soviet Union, had the military forces to control the populations that occupied the regions they colonized. The Colonization was also successful because these nations had the money necessary to bribe any native leaders in these colonized nations. The persistence of the imperialists continued as long as it did because the natural resources of the nations controlled by, for the most part, European nations, funded the occupation and still sent wealth to the home countries of the the aggressors. As the USA gained strength, it became part of this imperialist movement although the USA was a "come lately" party in this. It is recognized that imperialism does not need to mean colonialism. With force or the threat of force, Western nations could control the behavior of less powerful nations. Again, to a certain extent bribery or the inferred bribery of the local leaders was a big plus in the success of imperialism. it should also be recognized that Asian nations such as Japan can also fit into the category of imperialism. In Japan's case, force was the primary weapon used.
"To what extent should nations respond with diplomacy to the expansionist policies of other states?"
it doesent
After destruction, remnants or debris of the destroyed object remain. These remnants can vary in size and shape depending on the extent of the destruction. Additionally, memories or emotional impacts may also linger after physical destruction.
to the extent as to how far your moms vagina goes
Boomshakalaka!
To some extent. The North had the new rifle-barrelled cannons, and the industrial capacity to make more weapons of all kinds, as well as importing others.
Internationalism should be pursed to a high extent because it promotes cooperation, peace, and security between nations. Nations are brought together by internationalism. To the extent that it serves the well being of your nation. A nation is sovereign in the world. In a democracy the welfare of the citizens is utmost in interest of the leadership. If an international position serves the purposes of the citizens it should be pursued. If not it should not be pursued. It is not a one-size-fits-all answer.
Having tasted economic independence for too long a period,the American colonist had no desire to return to the mercantilist policies endured by the colonies of the other European nations.
Financial turmoil in Asia manifests the extent to which nations and regions are linked in a global economy.
They have been used but only to a limited extent. The difficulty is acquiring them and handling them safely. There is also the problem of transportation to the target. They require much more detailed knowledge than conventional weapons.
abcdefg
To a certain extent, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Ans.2: United Nations Organisation (which hasn't made a particularly good job of it thus far).