The people burdened by debt, like farmers, because it would have increased the amount of money in circulation.
The Cross of Gold was given by William Jennings Bryan on July 9, 1896 at the Chicago Coliseum. It considered the placing of the economy of the US on a gold standard while there would be no silver standard.
William McKinley ran on a 'gold standard' platform, which may be what you're looking for. William Jennings Bryan ran against him, favoring a 'bi-metallic' standard--both silver and gold. His 'Cross Of Gold' speech is a classic of saying a bunch of words without giving a single valid argument for what the speech advocates. TexasCharley
It was a strength because he supported populist ideas but it was a weakness because the populists lost some votes since Bryan was a Democrat
It was a strength because he supported populist ideas but it was a weakness because the populists lost some votes since Bryan was a Democrat
The Populist Party supported William Jennings Bryan because he championed issues important to agrarian and working-class Americans, such as free silver, which aimed to increase the money supply and alleviate debt burdens. His progressive stance on economic reform resonated with the Populists' goals of empowering farmers and laborers against the influence of big business and industrial elites. Bryan's 1896 Democratic National Convention speech, known as the "Cross of Gold" speech, further solidified his appeal to the Populists, who saw him as a strong advocate for their interests.
The Cross of Gold Speech
Cross of gold speech appealed to the Democratic Party at the Democratic National Convention in 1896. William Jennings Bryan delivered the speech, which is considered one of the greatest political speeches in our nation's history.
The Cross of Gold Speech
William Jennings Bryan
William Jennings Bryant
William Jennings Bryan
The Cross Of Gold
William Jennings Bryan
William Bryan
Help me
Help me
Emotional appeal helped Bryan achieve his goal in the "Cross of Gold" speech by connecting with the common people on a personal level. By using passionate and emotive language, he was able to generate strong feelings of empathy and solidarity among the audience. This emotional connection motivated the listeners to support his call for economic reform and to stand united against the wealthy elite.