answersLogoWhite

0

The northern states wanted to tax the southern states, so if they counted the slave population as part of the white community, then they could get more money. On the other hand, the southern states wanted representation in the government, so they wanted slaves to count as people so that they could have more representatives in Congress. The north didn't want the south to have more representatives, and the south didn't want to be taxed, so a man named Roger Sherman came up with the 3/5 Comprimise to satisfy both the north and the south.

Or just simply: how to count population for the purposes of taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What compromise was only part of the enslaved population would be counted when determining representations?

The compromise you're referring to is known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which was reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It stated that for the purposes of representation in Congress, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This arrangement aimed to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those of free states, influencing the distribution of political power in the newly formed United States.


What debates leading up to the three-fifths compromise southern states argued that?

Leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, southern states argued that enslaved individuals should be counted as part of the population for representation in Congress, despite them lacking voting rights. They contended that including enslaved people in the population count would give the South more political power and influence, helping to offset the population advantage of the northern states. Conversely, northern states opposed this notion, arguing that since enslaved individuals were not citizens and could not vote, they should not be counted for representation purposes. Ultimately, the compromise resulted in enslaved individuals being counted as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation.


What agreement determined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purpose of taxation and representation?

Three fifts compromise


What amendment made the three-fifths compromise meaningless?

The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified in 1865, made the three-fifths compromise meaningless by abolishing slavery in the United States. The compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, was rendered obsolete as it relied on the institution of slavery. With the abolition of slavery, there was no longer a need for such a compromise regarding representation in Congress.


What were the provisions of slave trade compromise?

The Slave Trade Compromise, part of the U.S. Constitution, allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue until 1808, after which Congress could prohibit it. Additionally, it stipulated that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slave labor, with those of Northern states, which were increasingly opposed to the practice.

Related Questions

What agreement detrmined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purposes of taxation and representation?

The Three-Fifths Compromise.


The ThreeFifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for?

The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for....? Representation in Congress and also direct taxes on the population of the states.


What does not describe the great compromise?

enslaved people counted in state populations


How did the delegates compromise about enslaved people?

By using the 3/5ths compromise.Only counting 3 out 5 slaves to be counted as 1.


What compromise was only part of the enslaved population would be counted when determining representations?

The compromise you're referring to is known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which was reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It stated that for the purposes of representation in Congress, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This arrangement aimed to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those of free states, influencing the distribution of political power in the newly formed United States.


How where slaves going to be counted?

Slaves were to be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of apportioning seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, as per the Three-Fifths Compromise included in the United States Constitution. This compromise was included during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a way to balance the interests of states with differing numbers of enslaved individuals.


What debates leading up to the three-fifths compromise southern states argued that?

Leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, southern states argued that enslaved individuals should be counted as part of the population for representation in Congress, despite them lacking voting rights. They contended that including enslaved people in the population count would give the South more political power and influence, helping to offset the population advantage of the northern states. Conversely, northern states opposed this notion, arguing that since enslaved individuals were not citizens and could not vote, they should not be counted for representation purposes. Ultimately, the compromise resulted in enslaved individuals being counted as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation.


What agreement determined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purpose of taxation and representation?

Three fifts compromise


What amendment made the three-fifths compromise meaningless?

The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified in 1865, made the three-fifths compromise meaningless by abolishing slavery in the United States. The compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, was rendered obsolete as it relied on the institution of slavery. With the abolition of slavery, there was no longer a need for such a compromise regarding representation in Congress.


Number of slaves counted for representation in the constitution?

it is a Compromise, which stipulates that three/fifths of the slave population would be counted for purposes of representation.


What were the provisions of slave trade compromise?

The Slave Trade Compromise, part of the U.S. Constitution, allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue until 1808, after which Congress could prohibit it. Additionally, it stipulated that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slave labor, with those of Northern states, which were increasingly opposed to the practice.


What was the now-notorious three-fifths compromise?

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a constitutional agreement reached in 1787 during the United States Constitutional Convention. It determined that for purposes of representation and taxation, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise was intended to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those advocating for the rights of enslaved individuals, ultimately impacting the political power dynamics in the early United States. It reflects the deep divisions over slavery that existed at the nation's founding.