Tiberius, the second Roman emperor, is often viewed with mixed opinions. While he was an able administrator who stabilized the empire and maintained its borders, his later years were marked by paranoia, political purges, and a withdrawal from public life. His reign saw both effective governance and increasing tyranny, making him a complex figure in Roman history. Ultimately, whether he is considered good or bad depends on one's perspective on his policies and actions.
The emperor Tiberius was in charge when Christ died.
Please rephrase your question because it is difficult to understand what you want to know.
A good one, he did many things that were of great benefit to the empire
Tiberius was important to Rome as the second emperor, succeeding Augustus and ruling from 14 AD to 37 AD. His reign was marked by significant administrative reforms and the consolidation of imperial power, which helped stabilize the empire after Augustus' death. Tiberius also expanded the empire's boundaries through military campaigns, although his later years were overshadowed by political purges and a retreat from public life. His leadership set important precedents for future emperors and highlighted the challenges of governance in a vast empire.
Tiberius is a man who needs a lot of studying. We get the views of the aristocrats as to his rule, and they were the ones who suffered in one way or another, so naturally nothing good will be said about him. His unpopularity was mainly because of his dour personality and his misplaced trust in Sejanus. Sejanus ruled Rome in Tiberius' absence with an iron fist, gathering allies and power for himself, with the deaths of many nobles on trumphed up charges. When Tiberius, who was living on Capri, was informed of what was going on, he took measures to rid himself of Sejanus and all Sejanus' followers and more deaths took place. These purges, were both blamed on Tiberius and he was hated. However, looking at the empire as a whole, Tiberius was one of the better emperors. The treasury was full and there were no major wars and the borders were secure.
Ancient Rome had many, good emperors. Some of them were Augustus, Tiberius (yes, Tiberius, he left the empire in excellent financial shape), Claudius, Vespasian, Trajan and Hadrian.
Tiberius was the second Roman emperor. He ruled the Roman empire.
Tiberius ruled the Roman empire from 14 AD/CE to 37 AD/CE
He sucked dick
Tiberius was a bad emperor. He built castles for himself with prisons, torture rooms, and places of execution. He was considered a monster and a tyrant. That said, he was financially very tight. He was not a complete wastrel like Caligula and Nero were but he lacked the wisdom (and the humanity to care) about actual infrastructural work done by Claudius
he beheaded a wife of his now that's bad
The emperor Tiberius was in charge when Christ died.
Tiberius Caesar, Agustus' adopted son, followed him as emperor.
he liked to suck dicks and he orderd to kill jesus.
Tiberius Caesar was the second emperor of Rome. He was the adopted son of Augustus and his heir.
Please rephrase your question because it is difficult to understand what you want to know.
A good one, he did many things that were of great benefit to the empire