Yes, Victorian streets were generally quite dirty. Urban areas faced significant challenges with waste management, leading to litter, animal droppings, and industrial pollution. The lack of proper sanitation systems contributed to foul odors and health hazards, making the streets unpleasant and hazardous for residents. Efforts to improve cleanliness would eventually emerge, but conditions remained poor for much of the Victorian era.
To sweep a dirty street
People were hungry and dirty. The ghettos were very dirty, which caused diseases. Also, human waste was thrown onto the streets.
There were no city garbage collectors. Streets were dirty and people called rag pickers sold things they found.
because it will have dirty water when it floods the streets. For example cans, rotten apple, left over food, and etc.
its like living in poverty, there is dung in the streets and many children do not wear shoes.no one has a clue on what was going on around them and there was no sewage so they had to cope with the smell and the dirt.
i think the streets were dirty and messy not looked after
Discusting.In the Victorian times they did the bathroom in a chamberpot then threw it out of the window on the streets it was revolting!
Most of the streets in inner London are Victorian or older.
safe streets are like manners or appropriate behavior in public.
slums
Theb streets where always busy with market sellers and buyers.
Apples, Flowers, Biscuits
To sweep a dirty street
It was dirty,tiring and really hard.
By todays standards yes. By their standards no.
Being a Victorian horse poo picker was dirty and challenging work. It involved following horses around city streets, collecting the manure and disposing of it properly. The job was essential for keeping city streets clean and avoiding the spread of diseases.
The dirty ones.