No, King John was not a direct successor to William the Conqueror. William the Conqueror, who reigned from 1066 to 1087, was succeeded by his son, William II, and then his other son, Henry I. King John, who reigned from 1199 to 1216, was the son of Henry II and a descendant of William the Conqueror through the Plantagenet lineage.
Yes william the conqueror is edward the confessors 2nd cousin
King John had a number of children, one of whom succeeded him as King Henry III.
no
As King, William the Conqueror would have had no one to lord over him. He fought for no other mans banner but his own as king.
they were all apart of the battle of Hastings in 1066. William the conqueror was the king of England in 1066 .
William the Conqueror was the Scandinavian King who took over England after Ethelred died. King Edward was not the successor to William the Conqueror.
William the Conqueror was the Scandinavian King who took over England after Ethelred died. King Edward was not the successor to William the Conqueror.
William the Conqueror was the Scandinavian King who took over England after Ethelred died. King Edward was not the successor to William the Conqueror.
a Norman - William the Conqueror - was king after defeating Edward's successor
No.
William, Duke of Normandy, who become known as William the Conquerer after he became King of England.
No, William Rufus was William the Conqueror's son. William I = William the Conqueror William II = William Rufus
William I (the Conqueror) lived: 1028-1087.He was the first Norman king of England.
Yes william the conqueror is edward the confessors 2nd cousin
William I, known as William the Conqueror.
food
William the Conqueror