Both; facts and "the fog of war."
The common criticism of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was that it was based on misleading information and exaggerated claims about North Vietnamese attacks on U.S. ships. Critics argued that it gave President Lyndon B. Johnson unchecked authority to escalate military involvement in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war. This lack of transparency and accountability fueled distrust among the American public and raised concerns about the integrity of U.S. foreign policy. Ultimately, the resolution became a symbol of the broader issues surrounding the Vietnam War and its controversial justification.
Yes. Otherwise men could not have been inducted (drafted) to fight the war, and money would not have been available to finance the war. The Congressional authorization was the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which has since been shown to hve been based upon a gross exageration of the events in the Gulf of Tonkin.
In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson sought congressional support for military action in Vietnam, leading to the passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This resolution was based on reports of alleged attacks on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf of Tonkin. It granted Johnson broad authority to use military force in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war, significantly escalating U.S. involvement in the conflict in both North and South Vietnam.
President Lyndon B. Johnson obtained congressional approval for the war in Vietnam through the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This resolution was passed in 1964 and gave the president broad powers to use military force in Southeast Asia without a formal declaration of war. It was based on the belief that U.S. naval vessels had been attacked by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf of Tonkin, although subsequent evidence suggested that the initial incident may have been exaggerated or fabricated.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident refers to two separate confrontations between North Vietnam and the United States in August 1964, which were used to justify increased U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. The first incident allegedly involved a U.S. destroyer, the USS Maddox, being attacked, while the second incident, involving the USS Turner Joy, was later disputed and considered to be based on misinterpretations. The incident led to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, giving President Lyndon B. Johnson broader powers to escalate military action in Vietnam. Subsequent investigations revealed discrepancies in the U.S. government's portrayal of the events.
The common criticism of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was that it was based on misleading information and exaggerated claims about North Vietnamese attacks on U.S. ships. Critics argued that it gave President Lyndon B. Johnson unchecked authority to escalate military involvement in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war. This lack of transparency and accountability fueled distrust among the American public and raised concerns about the integrity of U.S. foreign policy. Ultimately, the resolution became a symbol of the broader issues surrounding the Vietnam War and its controversial justification.
A lot of websites out there are based around photography have information on high resolution cameras. This website reviews them: www.imaging-resource.com/
Statistics themselves are purely factual and can not be biased or misleading. When people start making inferences and interpretations based on the statistics, that is when they can become biased or misleading.
Yes. Otherwise men could not have been inducted (drafted) to fight the war, and money would not have been available to finance the war. The Congressional authorization was the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which has since been shown to hve been based upon a gross exageration of the events in the Gulf of Tonkin.
H
In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson sought congressional support for military action in Vietnam, leading to the passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This resolution was based on reports of alleged attacks on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf of Tonkin. It granted Johnson broad authority to use military force in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war, significantly escalating U.S. involvement in the conflict in both North and South Vietnam.
When something is untrue, it means that it is not based on facts or reality. This can involve false information, misleading statements, or inaccuracies that do not align with the truth.
Logic should be based on documentable or empiric information. Perceptions can often be misleading , and colored by personal experiences.
All of the above. (Apex)
A misleading graph is when a graph provides only part of the information, or displays comparisons that are not based on all of the information. For example, a fiscal graph for a city may show a reduction in sales tax rates, but may not indicate that the decline was more than matched by an increase in other taxes (such as a franchise tax) on the same retail operations.
Malinformation refers to information that is based on reality but is deliberately shared to cause harm, manipulate, or mislead. Unlike misinformation, which is false or misleading information shared without harmful intent, malinformation takes true facts and presents them in a context intended to provoke negative consequences or influence public perception. This can include tactics like cherry-picking facts, spreading sensitive information, or using legitimate information in a misleading way.
The screen based images should have the same resolution as the screen - usually about 72dpi.