0
What else can I help you with?
Why the Missouri Compromise line did not provide a solution to the problem of California's statehood?
Because California was in both the north and south.
Why did the Missouri Compromise of 1820 work and the Missouri Compromise of 1850 failed to work?
Simply because it was a compromise - offering each side only part of what it wanted. As both sides were equally dissatisfied wirh it, however, it managed to preserve the balance, and it kept the pece for thirty years, until the admission of California defeated the terms of the compromise.
What was the underlying issue the Missouri compromise was intended to address and was it successful?
The Missouri Compromise, enacted in 1820, aimed to address the contentious issue of slavery's expansion into newly admitted states and territories, particularly as Missouri sought admission as a slave state. It established a line at the latitude of 36°30' north, designating areas north of this line as free and those south as slave-holding. While it temporarily alleviated sectional tensions and allowed Missouri to enter the Union, it ultimately failed to provide a lasting solution, as the underlying conflict over slavery continued to escalate, leading to the Civil War.
Why was The Missouri Compromise a bad idea?
The Missouri Compromise was considered a bad idea because it only provided a temporary solution to the growing tensions between free and slave states, ultimately failing to address the underlying issues of slavery and sectionalism. By drawing a line to separate free and slave territories, it entrenched the division rather than fostering unity. Additionally, it set a precedent for future compromises that would further complicate the slavery debate, contributing to the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. Ultimately, the compromise highlighted the inability of political solutions to resolve deep moral and social conflicts.
Why did new problems abought the spread of slavery come up after The Missouri Compromise?
After the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which aimed to maintain a balance between free and slave states, tensions intensified as new territories were acquired and debates arose over whether they would permit slavery. The compromise's temporary solution failed to address the underlying issues of sectionalism and the moral implications of slavery. Subsequent events, such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Dred Scott decision, further exacerbated conflicts, leading to violence and a more polarized national debate. Ultimately, these developments underscored the instability of compromises regarding slavery in the expanding United States.
What event did Henry clay find a solution for?
The missouri compromise
The solution that emerged in the Missouri Compromise was to admit Missouri?
The solution that emerged in the Missouri Compromise was to admit Missouri as a slave state. Every other territory north of the 36 degree 30 minutes north parallel line was to be admitted as a free state where slavery was prohibited.
The solution that emerged in The Missouri Compromise was the admit Missouri?
The solution that emerged in the Missouri Compromise was to admit Missouri as a slave state. Every other territory north of the 36 degree 30 minutes north parallel line was to be admitted as a free state where slavery was prohibited.
Was the Missouri compermise the permanent solution on the issue of slavery?
It managed to keep the peace for thirty years, until the annexing of the vast new territories from Mexico. The terms of the Compromise did not apply to these territories. It might have been better if they had. California would then have been admitted to the Union as two states, North California (free soil) and South California (slave-state), and war might have been avoided.
Was the Missouri compromise a good solution between the free states and the slave states?
yes
Was the Missouri compromise a good solution to debate between free states and slave states?
yes
Why the Missouri Compromise line did not provide a solution to the problem of California's statehood?
Because California was in both the north and south.
Why did the Missouri Compromise of 1820 work and the Missouri Compromise of 1850 failed to work?
Simply because it was a compromise - offering each side only part of what it wanted. As both sides were equally dissatisfied wirh it, however, it managed to preserve the balance, and it kept the pece for thirty years, until the admission of California defeated the terms of the compromise.
What did the Missouri compromise attempt to do?
To balance the number of free and slave states.The solution to the missouri compromise was done by henry clay. He spent about 30 years trying to fix the problems that kept occurring with it. The solution enacted by Henry Clay in 1807 that fixed all the issues with the missouri compromise of 1820 was that if you havent noticed this isnt the right answer yet you need to get better at math xD.
How was the disagreement resolved by Congress regarding The Missouri Compromise?
The disagreement over the Missouri Compromise was resolved through a series of negotiations in 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state while Maine was admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance between free and slave states. Additionally, the compromise established the 36°30' parallel as the line dividing future free and slave territories in the Louisiana Purchase. This temporary solution aimed to quell sectional tensions but ultimately laid the groundwork for further conflicts over slavery in the years to come.
Did Missouri want to enter the union as a free state?
No. The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave-state, on condition that there would be no more slave-states North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border.
What did the Missouri Compromise of 1820 settle?
In its time, the Missouri Compromise was the solution made to keep the number of Slave and Free States in an even balance. The growth of the United States would later demand another way to keep both the South and the North balanced.
