The Chartist movement, which emerged in the UK during the 1830s and 1840s, primarily employed peaceful tactics to advocate for political reforms, such as universal suffrage and the secret ballot. However, some factions within the movement resorted to violence, particularly during the Newport Rising of 1839, when a protest turned into an armed confrontation. Overall, while the majority of Chartist activities were peaceful, instances of violence did occur in the context of their struggle for democratic rights.
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
The wspu supported violent tactics ......
None. Malcolm X threatened the use of violence (in self defense) to deter would-be aggression towards him.
I think that so long as it was non-violent, Dr. King would consider doing it, if it advanced his cause.
They smashed windows with small toffee hammers Would chain themselves out side of downing street Massive meetings in hyde park London on Sunday's They went on hungerstrike in prison Hope this helped :)
violent tratics of course
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
Fasting in jail was one of Gandhi's major tactics in his non-violent revolution.
The opposite of peacefull is quarrelsome
Non-violent Civil Disobedience
There were both peacefull and violent ways. Muhammed and his followers did fought many wars to establish islam like the one with tribe of banu .
violent scare tactics
To defend themselves against violent criminals.
to abandon, violent, militant tactics in favor of civil disobedience
peacefull
yes they were very peacefull they were so peacefull that they wouldn't even hurt a fly exept for food
Nonviolent is the avoidance of violent actions.