I would say yes. Although Pearl Harbor was a tragedy and many lives were lost, ultimately it accomplished purposes for both sides. For the Japanese, it destroyed much of the US naval fleet, initially crippling war efforts in the Pacific. (And would have been worse, except that several ships were out of the Harbor on maneuvers.) For the US, although they would have entered WWII at some point, it accelerated that entry by up to a year. Many people who were indifferent to what they saw as a "European" war became passionate after Pearl. (It had about the same effect on public sympathies as the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center.) You could even argue that the US would have been more reluctant to use the Atomic bombs on Japan, if they didn't still remember the 'unprovoked' attack on Pearl Harbor.
No. The Immigration Act took effect in 1924, while the attack on Pearl Harbor was in 1941.
Death
They didn't really effect it.
Only the damage and casualties.
It made Mobilization easier because people wanted to get revenge for Pearl Harbor. People readily joined the War effort.
The bombing of pearl harbor got the US into ww2
There was no atomic bombs on Pearl Harbor
No. The Immigration Act took effect in 1924, while the attack on Pearl Harbor was in 1941.
yes.
Death
They didn't really effect it.
Japan was now at war with the US.
The United States remained neutral in World War Two until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
Only the damage and casualties.
Many people died and there were many casualties
Pearl Harbor is in Hawaii.
It made Mobilization easier because people wanted to get revenge for Pearl Harbor. People readily joined the War effort.