As people began to move west they wanted the Native American lands, so the act made it official that the tribes were to be removed. From the very moment of the first colony the European settlers did their best to kill, remove, or displace the Native tribes from their lands. The government made treaties they broke and they forcibly removed people to reservations. The Federal army would go into a sleeping village early in the morning and kill men, women, and children. The government policy was a " good Indian was a dead one" and they would do anything to accomplish this task. Read Black Elk Speaks or Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee for further understanding of the genocide that was committed.
Many Americans attempted to conceal their actions during the Native American genocide by framing their policies and military campaigns as efforts to "civilize" Indigenous populations or promote westward expansion. They often used euphemisms like "relocation" and "manifest destiny" to mask the violent displacement and killing of Native Americans. Additionally, the U.S. government and settlers suppressed accounts of atrocities and promoted narratives that justified their actions, thereby attempting to legitimize their expansionist agenda while obscuring the brutal reality of their impact on Indigenous peoples.
Genocide implies the intention to exterminate and an ideological motive. Many argue that the European settlers in the Americas wanted the Native Americans' land and that and once the settlers had made the Native Americans 'harmless' the killings largely ceased.The timescale ... Genocide is usually commited over a much narrower timescale.Whether these points are conclusive is another matter, however.
No one protested the treatment of Native Americans. In fact the Native Americans outnumbered the 104 men. There was an empire of 15,000 Native Americans.
Yes most definitely. They purposely planned to kill the Native Americans.
We shouldn't he and his legions committed genocide of the native Americans. At least we get a day off of work...
no, closer to a genocide
no it was screwed up if you ask me :)
You can't since you can't sue the Government.
Many Americans attempted to conceal their actions during the Native American genocide by framing their policies and military campaigns as efforts to "civilize" Indigenous populations or promote westward expansion. They often used euphemisms like "relocation" and "manifest destiny" to mask the violent displacement and killing of Native Americans. Additionally, the U.S. government and settlers suppressed accounts of atrocities and promoted narratives that justified their actions, thereby attempting to legitimize their expansionist agenda while obscuring the brutal reality of their impact on Indigenous peoples.
Genocide implies the intention to exterminate and an ideological motive. Many argue that the European settlers in the Americas wanted the Native Americans' land and that and once the settlers had made the Native Americans 'harmless' the killings largely ceased.The timescale ... Genocide is usually commited over a much narrower timescale.Whether these points are conclusive is another matter, however.
No one protested the treatment of Native Americans. In fact the Native Americans outnumbered the 104 men. There was an empire of 15,000 Native Americans.
African Americans and/or native Americans
chicken nuggets
Yes most definitely. They purposely planned to kill the Native Americans.
None. That act was created to further the genocide of Natives.
No, however one could consider the killing of Native Americans, with both disease and war to be considered a genocide. Many different tribes were wiped out by the Europeans.
technically, carmel apples