Certainly.
War is defined by a having a state of violence between two parties, so by mere definition, yes.
Romanticism .
he wanted to stop the war because he believed that violence is not the element of success and violence doesn't get you anywhere.
Violence=war. There cannot be war without violence. Legal combatants are the only personnel involved with war; all non-combatants are to be evacuated.
the Boston Massacre was the first acts of violence recorded about the war.
a person who believes that war and violence are unjustifiable
The Logic of Violence in Civil War was created in 2006.
It made Ottoman leaders sus of groups that were not Turkish or Muslim. (APEX)
A pacifist is pro-peace. A pacifist is someone who does not believe in war or any kind of violence!
the war
just like it sounds: pacifist (someone/something opposed to any violence or war).
Violence associated with checkers? Um, yea. Violence = killing = blood = war
Quakers have always been against wars and violence. So they would have disagreed with any type of killing or war.
Violence is wen u try to harm a person. War is trying to dominate the other countries by harming them
The justification of violence in World War I can be debated from various perspectives. Some argue that the war was a response to aggression and imperial ambitions, making military action necessary to defend national sovereignty and uphold alliances. Others contend that the scale of violence and the resulting devastation, including the loss of millions of lives, raises moral questions about the justification of such conflict. Ultimately, the complexities of geopolitics, nationalism, and the consequences of war challenge any clear justification for violence.
Pacifist, a pacifist is a person who does not believe in war or violence of any kind.
Romanticism .
Ares