They were more different
European migrants transferred familiar patterns and institutions to their colonies in the Americas through the establishment of social, political, and economic structures similar to those in their home countries. They implemented European-style governance, such as colonial assemblies and legal systems, and introduced agricultural practices, land use, and trade systems that mirrored those of Europe. Additionally, they brought cultural elements, including language, religion, and education, which helped shape the societies in the colonies and facilitated the integration of European customs into local practices. This transfer significantly influenced the development of colonial societies and their subsequent identities.
In Japan, merchants were not as well regarded, peasant farmers were more highly regarded and women were exacted to be stronger.
One way in which the Tang Dynasty, Gupta Empire, and European Renaissance are similar is that they all witnessed significant advancements in art, literature, and architecture. During these periods, there was a flourishing of artistic expression, with new techniques and styles being developed. Additionally, there was a heightened focus on intellectual pursuits, with scholars and philosophers making important contributions to their respective societies.
The code of Bushido is like the code of Chivalry for European Knights during the feudal period of Europe. They contain rules and regulations on how the elite warrior should train, act around royalty and commoners, and how they should lead life and fight wars.practice of chivalry by European knights
European and Native American lives were similar in that both groups relied on their environments for sustenance, engaging in agriculture, hunting, and gathering. However, their social structures and worldviews differed significantly; Europeans often emphasized land ownership and centralized governance, while many Native American tribes practiced communal land use and had diverse forms of governance. Additionally, Europeans tended to have more rigid class hierarchies, whereas many Native American societies valued kinship and communal decision-making. These differences shaped their interactions and conflicts during European colonization.
In my opinion they were similar in some ways but different in others.
The Japanese daimyo was similar to the European Lord.
Both the European and Japanese feudal systems developed as a result of a weak central government.
Feudalism in japan was similar to European feudalism as they both involved the same heirachy and therefore was quite simialr apart from the class definitions.
The European Serfs.
mn;
Social Darwinism was the idea that different societies and races compete for survival in a similar way to species in nature, with the fittest coming out on top. This concept was used to justify European imperialism in Asia and Africa by suggesting that it was not only beneficial but also natural for superior European nations to dominate and exploit weaker non-European societies.
All European governments seemed similar, but they're actually different regarding structure in their governments
Aryan societies are typically divided into three basic castes: the priests/kings, the warriors, and the skilled artisans. Peasant farmers, where they existed, were at the bottom. Different Indo-European societies were organized in different way, for example the Celts separated their priests (druids) from their kings; ancient Hindus had a five caste system which included Laborers and Untouchables, etc. But all Aryan societies come from the same origin and have very similar organization.
Both societies were unified by shared religious traditions.
The EU is similar to a confederation, and there are many different branches of political leaders. These include the European Council, Parliament, and the European Commission.
Japanese and Korean share some grammatical similarities, and some words. Other than this, they are quite different.