The Stamp Act of 1765 was argued to be a tax without representation since the British colonies had no representatives in the British Parliament.
"No Taxation Without Representation!" was the phrase.
No taxation without representation in parliament
"No taxation without representation"
"No taxation without representation"
Taxation Without Representation is Tyranny
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).
"No Taxation Without Representation!" was the phrase.
No taxation without representation in parliament
"No taxation without representation"
"No taxation without representation!"
Taxation without representation??
"No taxation without representation"
In a nutshell, they were angry because they had no direct representation in the British Government. Taxation without representation!
Taxation Without Representation is Tyranny
Taxation without Representation
The Colonists' unhappiness with taxation without representation was probably a surprise to the British King because there was a notion that the Colonists would pay a tax, no matter what, to receive the goods they needed in the New World.
Taxation without representation was a huge complaint by the colonists because they believed it violated their rights as English citizens. They argued that since they had no elected representatives in the British Parliament, they had no say in decisions regarding taxation. This lack of representation was seen as unfair and oppressive, leading to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government.