King Minos didn't have powers. He was mortal.
They had powers over thegd
In an absolute monarchy the king has power over all branches
A dictator could have the sme powers of a king in Roman times.
True
JULIUS CAESAR DID MOT BECOME KING OR RULER OF THE ROME BECAUSE HE WAS NOT CONFIDENTLY IN RULLING ROME VERY MUCH.YET HE LOVED ROME VERY MUCH BUT HE DID NOT WANT TO BE SUCCESSOR OF THE PREVIOUS KING. PS.He didn't become Emperor because Emperors were hated and feared at that time.
King Midas didn't have any powers!
yes
The constitution does NOT address a king so no powers are given. The men who fought the Revolutionary war fought to rid themselves of a king.
The powers that remained with the king typically included control over the military, the ability to levy taxes, and authority over foreign affairs. These powers were crucial because they allowed the king to maintain sovereignty and ensure national security, while also generating revenue for the state. Retaining these powers enabled the king to exert influence and authority, even in a landscape where other powers, such as legislative bodies or regional governors, were gaining strength. This balance was vital for the stability and governance of the realm.
The Egyptions believed that their kings were gods and had magicail powers
The King does not have many rights or powers in the United Kingdom, when it comes to legal issues. However, they do have many rights when it comes to giving permission.
no
They had powers over thegd
King Midas power was to turn anything into gold that he touched.
the person that wanted to be king who almost threatened the king.
It limited the monarch's powers, saying that the king is not above the law, that the king is subject to the law.
You're thinking of Julius Caesar. He served in the senate and during his dictatorships, especially the last one, he had all the powers of a king.