I think they built mounds for religious purposes and as cemetaries for the dead .
The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.The Romans were successful empire builders mainly because of three things: the had the strongest army, they had great organizational ability, and they had a uniform law.
They wanted to know why things happen the way they happened.
anthropology
upbringing, political views, and religious views
Archaeologists uncover the things through intensive research and experience.
Artifacts are important to Historians (and Archaeologists) because they are actual evidence of past human activity. However fossils are NOT important to historians as they are too old, they ARE important to Geologists.
Sort of. They're both anthropological fields and they both contain elements of each other. Archaeologists focus on concrete things: artifacts, architecture, etc. Historians are more focused on everything as a whole writing and studying history itself.
people have found that life in Pompeii was a lot like our world today without all the electric things.
people have found that life in Pompeii was a lot like our world today without all the electric things.
Historians study the past by analyzing written records, documents, and artifacts to understand past events. Archaeologists study the past by excavating and analyzing physical remains like pottery, tools, and structures to reconstruct past societies. Anthropologists study human culture and society, often focusing on traditional lifeways, beliefs, and customs passed down through generations.
they build things with builders
Generally, historians do not actually dig in the ground for artifacts. Archeologists do that and inform historians of the their findings.
They study ancient civilizations
they build things with builders
Archaeologists are the individuals who study and uncover artifacts from the past through excavation and analysis.
I believe that the type of work you are referring to - excavating historic sites to find evidence to suggest certain things about the lives of ancient civilizations - is done by a mixture of archaeologists, geographers, and historians.