In the excerpt from the Declaration of Independence, the author anticipates and indirectly refutes the argument that the colonies should remain loyal to British rule for stability and protection. By asserting that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, the author implies that loyalty to a tyrannical government is unjustifiable. This challenges the notion that loyalty should override the pursuit of freedom and self-determination, suggesting that a government that fails to protect its citizens' rights loses its legitimacy.
they refused to sell products to Americans
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
In the Declaration of Independence, the author anticipates the argument that the colonies should remain loyal to Britain and accept British rule for their protection and governance. The author refutes this by asserting that legitimate government derives its power from the consent of the governed, and when a government becomes destructive to those ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. This rationale justifies the colonies' decision to seek independence, emphasizing that their grievances against British rule warrant such a drastic measure.
by sucking a big hairy cock hahahhahahahhhaha
The main idea of the Declaration of Independence is the assertion of the American colonies' right to self-governance and independence from British rule. It argues that all men are created equal and possess unalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, which governments are established to protect. Key facts supporting this argument include the list of grievances against King George III, illustrating the abuses of power and violations of the colonists' rights, and the philosophical foundation rooted in Enlightenment ideas about government and individual rights.
In The Autobiography, The Declaration Of Independence Jefferson uses Parallel Structure in his Argument when he is airing the grievances of the farmers.
The king was abusive and they declared independence from the crown.
The king was abusive and they declared independence from the crown.
the declaration of independence makes an argument for independence because some of the wars colonist fought in didn't get independence................... i'm not sure if this the right answer but at least i tried........ i just guessed this answer looking in my text book hopefully its right
they refused to sell products to Americans
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
deprived americans of their natural rights
In the Declaration of Independence, the author anticipates the argument that the colonies should remain loyal to Britain and accept British rule for their protection and governance. The author refutes this by asserting that legitimate government derives its power from the consent of the governed, and when a government becomes destructive to those ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. This rationale justifies the colonies' decision to seek independence, emphasizing that their grievances against British rule warrant such a drastic measure.
by sucking a big hairy cock hahahhahahahhhaha
The main argument of the Declaration of Independence is that the people of a land have rights and freedoms that should not be ignored by governments or rulers, and that if these "unalienable rights" are ignored, the people have the right to form a society of their own. In the case of the American colonists, they had decided that they were no longer willing to be subjects of the British king.
A solid argument for breaking away from British
Britain had plenty of other colonies all over the world, and this fact was not used as evidence for why the colonies should be free. The Declaration of Independence focused only on the American colonies.