0
What else can I help you with?
At the constitutional convention of 1787 the three fifths compromise and the great compromise dealt with the issue of?
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
What events lead to the great compromise?
The issue of representation led to the Connecticut (or great) compromise.
What issue led to both magna carta and the establishment of parliament?
how to end taxation without representation.
Which issue was settled by the Three-fifths Compromise at the Constitutional Convention?
The 3/5 Compromise settled the issue of how slave populations would be considered in determining representation in the House of Representatives. Although slaves were not citizens, and could not vote, the Southern states wanted them counted as residents for apportionment purposes.The Three-fifths Compromise gave the otherwise small white populations of the South an equal footing with the more populous North, and this compromise held until the basic issue of slavery became paramount in the 1820s and 1830s. The question of extending slavery into new states eventually led to the Civil War (1861-1865) and the end of slavery in the US.---It dealt with slavery and the issue of including them into the population of Southern states.The Three-Fifths Compromise settled the issue of how slaves would be counted in terms of congressional representation and how the state would be taxed. Since slaves weren't allowed to vote, they were counted as three-fifths of a free, voting white male.How states would count the slave population for purposes of taxation and representation
What main issue did the great compromise settle?
Representation in Congress :)
At the constitutional convention of 1787 the three fifths compromise and the great compromise dealt with the issue of?
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
What compromise at the constitutional convention ended the argument over how to count slaves for taxation and representation?
This was not an issue presented at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 in Philadelphia. It was an issue that came about later and was resolved with the 3/5 compromise. Each slave was counted as 3/5 a person for census/taxation purposes. Good Luck!
Which issue reguarding slavery was resolved at the convention?
The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
What was the goal of the three fifths compromise?
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
What two compromises were reached over the issue of the slave trade?
Two compromises reached over the issue of the slave trade were the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for representation in Congress, and the Constitutional Compromise of 1808, which allowed the United States to ban the importation of slaves in 1808.
Why was the Three-Fifths Comprimise necessary?
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
What issue did the great compromise resolve-?
representation in Congress
What issue was addressed by three fifths compromise?
They agreed with the south who owed slaves
What events lead to the great compromise?
The issue of representation led to the Connecticut (or great) compromise.
What issue led to both magna carta and the establishment of parliament?
how to end taxation without representation.
Which issue was settled by the Three-fifths Compromise at the Constitutional Convention?
The 3/5 Compromise settled the issue of how slave populations would be considered in determining representation in the House of Representatives. Although slaves were not citizens, and could not vote, the Southern states wanted them counted as residents for apportionment purposes.The Three-fifths Compromise gave the otherwise small white populations of the South an equal footing with the more populous North, and this compromise held until the basic issue of slavery became paramount in the 1820s and 1830s. The question of extending slavery into new states eventually led to the Civil War (1861-1865) and the end of slavery in the US.---It dealt with slavery and the issue of including them into the population of Southern states.The Three-Fifths Compromise settled the issue of how slaves would be counted in terms of congressional representation and how the state would be taxed. Since slaves weren't allowed to vote, they were counted as three-fifths of a free, voting white male.How states would count the slave population for purposes of taxation and representation
What main issue did the great compromise settle?
Representation in Congress :)
