water crisis
Not really, because then the money becomes worthless. For example, when Russia was struck by economic crisis after WW 1, it was actually more cost effective to burn their money than to pay for wood.
no, it saved at least an order of magnitude more lives than it cost
True
. A nation might turn to military leaders and Extreme Nationalists during a time of crisis because these leaders have a far greater sense of nationalism than government leaders or politicians. This sense of nationalism would inspire the people and make them far more likely to get through the crisis at hand.
The early end to the war saved more lives from combat action than the number of lives lost with the two bombs dropped on Japan.
Safe? yes; whether it lives up to its actual claims and does anything more than regular less expensive vitamins: I have no idea.
Gangrene claims about 25,000 lives each year
They are reasonable and they have more than one side (Apex)
More than one crisis can be referred to as a "series of crises" or "multiple crises." In some contexts, it may also be termed a "crisis situation" or "crisis event." The term "polycrisis" is also used to describe interconnected crises that affect various aspects of society, such as economic, environmental, and social challenges occurring simultaneously.
hi
Denmark
Are electronic claims edited at a higher standard than paper claims
Are electronic claims edited at a higher standard than paper claims
Depends on wether or not you can prove he makes more than he claims.
A plant that lives for more than one growing season is called a perennial.
Meerkats of course!
heart disease is the number one killer in the Philippines and claims around 100,000 lives per year. Accidents, pneumonia, cancer, tuberculosis, and lower respiratory disease claim many lives as well. In 2012, more than 2 million people died.