answersLogoWhite

0

Which one? There were at least three US Supreme Court cases concerning the Cherokee Nation during Chief Justice Marshall's tenure on the bench.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What landmark case was chief justice john Marshall involved with?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice during the 1803 case Marbury vs. Madison. This case increased the Supreme Court's power when Marshall established the principle of judicial review. This gave the Supreme Court power to overturn laws passed by Congress on grounds of unconstitutionality.


Who was Chief Justice John Marshall in Gideon v Wainwright case?

John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (1801-1835); he didn't play a role in Gideon v. Wainwright,(1963), because he had been dead approximately 128 years by the time the case reached the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969) presided over Gideon.


Who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the case of Gibbons vs Ogden?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.


How did Chief Justice John Marshall rule in the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison?

In the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court had the power of judicial review to declare laws unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review in the United States.


Who is John Marshall and how is he connected to the case of Marbury v. Madison"?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835. He is connected to the case of Marbury v. Madison because he wrote the landmark decision in that case, establishing the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional.

Related Questions

What was the Chief Justice Marshall's decision in the case of Marbury v.Madison?

The Court through Chief Justice Marshall unanimously decided not to require Madison to deliver the commission to Marbury.


Who did chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall side with in the case Worcester vs Georgia?

In the case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall sided with the Cherokee Nation. He ruled that the state of Georgia did not have the authority to impose its laws on Cherokee territory, thus affirming the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation. This decision reinforced the principle that federal treaties with Native American tribes must be upheld, although it was largely ignored by President Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia.


How did John Marshall remove Indians?

He didn't. Chief Justice John Marshall opposed the federal government removing the Cherokee from their land, but never had an opportunity to hear a case against the United States in which the Supreme Court had appropriate jurisdiction to issue a ruling.


What landmark case was chief justice john Marshall involved with?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice during the 1803 case Marbury vs. Madison. This case increased the Supreme Court's power when Marshall established the principle of judicial review. This gave the Supreme Court power to overturn laws passed by Congress on grounds of unconstitutionality.


Who was the supreme court justice for the Marbury vs Madison case?

Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the Court in 1803, when the case was finally allowed to go to trial. Chief Justice Marshall authored the opinion of the Court for Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803). Marbury v. Madison is the case most often cited when discussing the origin of judicial review.For more information about Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.


In which supreme court decision did chief Justice John Marshall rule tht Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee?

In the Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws on Cherokee lands, affirming the sovereignty of Native American nations. The Court held that only the federal government could regulate relations with Native American tribes, thus recognizing the Cherokee Nation's rights to their territory. This decision, however, was not effectively enforced, leading to continued conflict and the forced removal of the Cherokee people.


Who was the Chief Justice who established the US Supreme Court as the final interpreter of the Constitution?

Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall, in the US Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison, (1803).


Who was Chief Justice John Marshall in Gideon v Wainwright case?

John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (1801-1835); he didn't play a role in Gideon v. Wainwright,(1963), because he had been dead approximately 128 years by the time the case reached the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969) presided over Gideon.


In 1824 chief justice john marshall set another precedent in the case of Gibbons v Ogden true of false?

True


In this case Chief Justice John Marshall and the Court gave up some power in order to get more. Explain. What power did they give up What power did they gain Why did the Court do this?

Chief Justice John Marshall and the Court gave up the power to establish courts and to issue writs of mandamus.


Who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the case of Gibbons vs Ogden?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.


How did Chief Justice John Marshall rule in the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison?

In the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court had the power of judicial review to declare laws unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review in the United States.