answersLogoWhite

0

It seems incredible to think now, in this age of great communication, that 70 years ago the Prime Minister of one of the most powerful empires this world has ever known was unaware of what was going on throughout Europe. What could Churchill do anyway ? He himself was responsible for Bengali Holocaust, 6 million starved Indians, and was racist and for eugenics. Britain was fighting for its very survival. But I am of the opinion that Churchill knew very little about what was happening in, say, southern Poland, until the Russians relieved these terrible places. Yes, anti semitism was commonly known in Britain before the war, but what this had resulted in in terms of the mass of murders was a wholly different scale. It was one thing, if you'll pardon my comparison, to be horrid to the Jews, but to kill millions of them was something different. Britain did not go to war over the Jews, it went to war, eventually, to prevent the further expansion of Germany in Europe. The sad truth is that the Holocaust was seen as a by product of WW2, largely unseen until 1945, one might think a blind eye was turned. I think there wrere two blind eyes. When the Allies arrived at Belsen the shock was palpable & the horror never for a moment envisaged. but the fact remains even had Churchill known there was little he could have done more than he did, at least as Prime Minister from 1940. I'm not sure the conjecture of what would have happened had he been in power before that time is worth consideration.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?