He supported the North.
As an improvement I'll add this quote from Marx Marx hailed the Union war effort as a matchless struggle for the reconstruction of a social world.
It was because of the South that the Civil War started, because they seceeded from the Union and started the first battle. So you can say the general was Robert E. Lee of the Confederacy.
He didnt have too much to say after the war, because he was assassinated right around the end of the war.
There were 36 battles fought in the civil warNEW RESPONDENTThere were about 8,000 occasions in which hostilities occurred in the American Civil War.
No. Not really. The Alamo was a battle in the War for Texas independance from Mexico. You could say that it was a civil war because some Texans who favored independance were fighting against people of Mexican descent who did not want to separate from Mexico.
You can't say he was the last to die of the civil war. A person who dies in the civil war has to be actually involved in the war, as in fighting. By your logic there can be no defined last casualty because who is to say that there will not be a future incident where someone is fatally shot by an old bullet or an antique pistol. So no the last death in the civil war was at the last glorious battle somewhere in Texas. An old man who unfortunately had an accident with an old relic is not a war death. And also, what if a man gets killed because a bridge from the War of 1812 falls on him? This does not qualify him for the casualty list. But it would be funny to see him on the roster of deaths on wikipedia.
There is no evidence that Karl Marx specifically said "Never Trust a Russian." Marx's work focused on critiquing capitalism and promoting socialism, and he did not make widespread statements about specific nationalities or individuals.
No, there is no record of Karl Marx having said this quote. Karl Marx was a philosopher and economist known for his theories on capitalism, socialism, and communism, but this particular quote does not align with his views on suffering.
I would say that Karl Marx performed very little labor himself, or he might have had a different thought about it.
Karl Marx believed that capitalism should be destroyed because he felt that it would lead to the exploitation of the Proletarians (the have-nots) by the Bourgeoisie (the haves). Karl Marx was a socialist. Needless to say, I think he was right.
Yes, Karl Marx argued that in a capitalist system, capital is produced by the exploitation of labor by the capitalist class. He believed that profits are derived from the surplus value created by workers that is not returned to them in the form of wages.
According to Engels, Karl Marx was smarter. According to Marx, Karl Marx was smarter. Marx thought he was smarter than everyone else. He even referred to some of his supporters as "useful idiots." Engels always gave Marx the lion's share of the credit for their philosophical writings. Marx's life work, "Capital", the theoretical foundation of his philosophy was written by him only with some editing help by Engels. "The Communist Manifesto" was written by both of them but it was only a short pamphlet.
It was Adam Smith, not Karl Marx, who said that government should encourage competition between business. In a (theoretical) communist society there is no competition because everyone works solely for the common good.
Karl Marx wrote this statement in his book "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon," which was published in 1852. Marx used this phrase to discuss how historical events can have similar patterns, but each iteration can have different outcomes or significance.
Karl Marx did not specifically address child abuse in his works. However, he advocated for the elimination of social and economic conditions that perpetuated inequalities and injustices, including those that could contribute to child abuse. Marx's focus was on highlighting the exploitative nature of capitalism and calling for a more equitable society.
It is difficult to say for sure. Marx never claimed to be one, and talked about Freemasons as if he did not know (or care) much about them. The sources which suggest that he was a member of a lodge do name a real Lodge attached to the Grand Orient of France in Osterbruck (L'Étoile Anséatique), but Marx had no connection with Osterbruck and it is highly unlikely that he would have joined a lodge there.
They wanted to keep slavery and the north didn't and that is what started the civil war
Yes, he was German, having been born in Trier, Germany. To be more specific however, one might say he was actually Prussian, because at the time of Marx's birth Prussia was an independent Germanic state that was eventually absorbed in the country of Germany.