0
Poor children often engaged in outdoor play, using their imagination and natural surroundings, as they typically had limited access to toys or organized activities. They might participate in games like tag or scavenging for materials to create their own entertainment. In contrast, rich children often had access to structured activities, such as sports, music lessons, and social events, along with a plethora of toys and games. Their leisure time was frequently spent in more organized environments, such as clubs or private gatherings.
What else can I help you with?
Which group of Athenians had the most leisure time?
Most Athenians were poor and hardworking, working long hours with little leisure time. The groups that would have had the most time for leisure would have been the richest people.
Did the rich Victorians children play with the poor Victorian children?
Definitely not because, Rich children thought that the poor were horrible disgusting animals They were not taught that the poor were horrible, disgusting animals, but there was always the risk of disease from the poor..On the plus side many philanthropic institutions were started in the UK during this time, such as The Salvation Army and Dr.Barnados, also many other minor charities and hospitals
Were colonial tailors rich or poor?
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.
What was daily life like for roman women describe two differences that existed between women who were wealthy and those who were poor?
The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.
What did the rich people were in the Victorians time and the poor?
The rich wore fancy gowns and suits the poor wore rags and other horrid stuff
Was there a differences between the leisure of the rich and the poor (Aztecs)?
Yes, there were significant differences between the leisure activities of the rich and poor in Aztec society. The wealthy elite had access to more luxurious pastimes, such as elaborate feasts, hunting, and rituals, while the poor engaged in simpler forms of entertainment, like playing traditional games or participating in community festivals. Additionally, the rich could afford more time for leisure due to their status and resources, whereas the poor often had to work harder to meet their daily needs, leaving them with less time for leisure activities.
What is the leisure of the poor and rich?
The leisure activities of the poor may include community events, spending time with family, or engaging in low-cost hobbies. The rich may enjoy luxury travel, fine dining, cultural experiences, and activities that require significant financial investment.
Which group of Athenians had the most leisure time?
Most Athenians were poor and hardworking, working long hours with little leisure time. The groups that would have had the most time for leisure would have been the richest people.
Did the rich Victorians children play with the poor Victorian children?
Definitely not because, Rich children thought that the poor were horrible disgusting animals They were not taught that the poor were horrible, disgusting animals, but there was always the risk of disease from the poor..On the plus side many philanthropic institutions were started in the UK during this time, such as The Salvation Army and Dr.Barnados, also many other minor charities and hospitals
Why did robin hood not have any children?
He was too busy robbing from the rich and giving to the poor. He didn't have enough time for Maid Marion.
What did people do in their leisure time in 1750?
The rich read books and went to ballets and music concerts while the poor betted on boxing matches and went to fairs to watch bear-baiting and other horrible shows.
Were colonial tailors rich or poor?
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.
What was daily life like for roman women describe two differences that existed between women who were wealthy and those who were poor?
The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.
Were there rich people and poor people?
they were rich but people say most on the street and sobbine all the time
How do you use leisure in a sentence?
On Sundays, we liked to lounge leisurely around the house.
What did the rich people were in the Victorians time and the poor?
The rich wore fancy gowns and suits the poor wore rags and other horrid stuff
What is mass leisure culture?
Mass leisure culture is the idea that people can pursue leisure in the middle classes, as opposed to the past, where only the rich and noble could afford entertainment. Mass leisure arose during the time of the Industrial Revolution, which spanned from the 18th to 20th centuries.
