It proved that the Article of Confederation were too weak. The govenment was too weak to do anything.
Epitomized all of the dysfunction of the Articles of Confederation and prompted the founding fathers to call the Constitutional Convetion to "revise" the Articles.
shays rebellion was good because it allowed for farmers to be represented through shays army and then caused for people to see the negative aspects of the Articles of Confederation and caused the conventional congress to make changes
That congress, or The gov't, could not raise an army to "suppress insurrections." They could not really do anything at all. For example, they could make laws, but couldn't enforce them.
The Articles of Confederation required a 100% unanimous vote to make any action. While some people would vote to end the taxes and other problems causing such events as Shays' Rebellion, those who benefited from the taxes wouldn't. The vote wouldn't be unanimous, and no action would be taken.
Shay's Rebellion was caused by farmers with major debt. This rebellion showed that the government under the Articles of Confederation was to weak because of the fact that the government was not able to prepare an army. Without the army, Shay's Rebellion went out of hand until the rich were able to get together and pay to make an army. People finally realized that the government needed to have more power in order to do such things like making an army.
Epitomized all of the dysfunction of the Articles of Confederation and prompted the founding fathers to call the Constitutional Convetion to "revise" the Articles.
shays rebellion was good because it allowed for farmers to be represented through shays army and then caused for people to see the negative aspects of the Articles of Confederation and caused the conventional congress to make changes
to govern them selves better because the bill of rights wasent good enough because the people were in shays rebellion and they didnt have an army because they states had to much power so they had another meetin to make the Constitution
One was the preference for the "Virginia Plan" seeking a strong central government. The Constitution of the US was finally ratified and Massachusetts under the new governorship of John Hancock and the reprive of the Rebels was finally able to achieve a more peaceful and stable form of government.
The men that were going against the government were trying to make the Articles of Confederation. the articles of confederation were weak, they consisted of only a legislative branch with no judicial or executive. having shays rebellion made the people know they need to change the articles of confederation. after that we had a stronger and more powerful central government.
That congress, or The gov't, could not raise an army to "suppress insurrections." They could not really do anything at all. For example, they could make laws, but couldn't enforce them.
The Articles of Confederation required a 100% unanimous vote to make any action. While some people would vote to end the taxes and other problems causing such events as Shays' Rebellion, those who benefited from the taxes wouldn't. The vote wouldn't be unanimous, and no action would be taken.
Shay's Rebellion was caused by farmers with major debt. This rebellion showed that the government under the Articles of Confederation was to weak because of the fact that the government was not able to prepare an army. Without the army, Shay's Rebellion went out of hand until the rich were able to get together and pay to make an army. People finally realized that the government needed to have more power in order to do such things like making an army.
The men that were going against the government were trying to make the articles of confederation. the articles of confederation were weak, they consisted of only a legislative branch with no judicial or executive. having shays rebellion made the people know they need to change the articles of confederation. after that we had a stronger and more powerful central government.
This event occurred in Massachusetts, in the Springfield area.Farmers in western Massachusetts resented the fact that the state's tax laws favored trade at the expense of farming. The state legislature was composed mostly of merchants from Boston and other shipping towns and cities. In 1786, farmers assembled in conventions and demanded that their property tax be lowered. To make up for the loss of revenue, they called for the abolition of aristocratic branches of the government in Boston. A Revolutionary War veteran named Daniel Shays led about 2,000 armed men against the Springfield arsenal. The rebellion collapsed but the problems continued. Shays and his followers believed they were simply carrying on the sprit of the Revolution.The rebellion started on August 29, 1786 it occured in central and western Massachusetts from 1786 to 1787.
A Revolutionary War veteran named Daniel Shays led about 2,000 armed men against the Springfield arsenal. The governor of Massachusetts asked for help from the national government but the government under the Articles were unable to act. The rebellion eventually collapsed but the problems continued. Shays and his followers believed they were simply carrying on the sprit of the Revolution. Thomas Jefferson, then minister to France, agreed with them. "A little rebellion now and then is a good thing," he wrote to a friend. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Washington did not agree with Jefferson. He welcomed the failure of Shays's Rebellion and he compared it to his having to use force to prevent a military coup by a group of army officers under his command. He believed citizens could not take up arms whenever they felt something was not done correctly or they had a grievance.
if your doing a multiple choice quiz like i was, id pick soildiers [i picked it and got it right] else,if your writing an essey, the prievious answer [below] will help you alot.Farmers in western Massachusetts resented the fact that the state's tax laws favored trade at the expense of farming. The state legislature was composed mostly of merchants from Boston and other shipping towns and cities. In 1786, farmers assembled in conventions and demanded that their property tax be lowered. To make up for the loss of revenue, they called for the abolition of aristocratic branches of the government in Boston. A Revolutionary War veteran named Daniel Shays led about 2,000 armed men against the Springfield arsenal. The rebellion collapsed but the problems continued. Shays and his followers believed they were simply carrying on the sprit of the Revolution. Thomas Jefferson, then minister to France, agreed with them. "A little rebellion now and then is a good thing," he wrote to a friend. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Washington did not agree with Jefferson. He welcomed the failure of Shays's Rebellion and he compared it to his having to use force to prevent a military coup by a group of army officers under his command. He believed citizens could not take up arms whenever they felt something was not done correctly or they had a grievance.--kevinreturns