Land, Tax, more knowledge taken from the people of Singapore [if they have some that the British did not], more CHEAP Labour, more resources...etc. etc.
cocoa, palm oil, groundnuts
All non British, countries, colonies, territories or protectorates were not part of the British Empire.
Taxation without representation.
Mozambique. Not only was never a part of the British Empire, but has no ties linking it to the British Empire.
No, Vietnam was part of the French Empire.
Being part of the British Empire provided Singapore with significant economic and infrastructural benefits. The British established Singapore as a major trading port, which facilitated commerce and attracted businesses, leading to economic growth. Additionally, British governance introduced modern infrastructure, education, and legal systems that contributed to the development of the city-state. However, this relationship also led to social and political complexities that shaped Singapore’s future.
cocoa, palm oil, groundnuts
large profits from the slave trade
The foundation of Singapore breaks the monopoly and the Dutch are no longer the exclusive sovereigns of the eastern seas. Simply put: -To break Dutch monopoly -To protect British trade with China -To extend British influence
Before independence, Singapore was part of the British Empire. It is also worthy to note that there was no development where Singapore now is before the British built it.
No. The United Kingdom is comprised of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. You may be confusing it with the old British Empire, of which Singapore was a part. It is still a self-governing state within the British Commonwealth.
you are therefore part of the british empire
protection would be one thing.x
The USA has never been part of the British Empire.
They were all part of the British Empire
All non British, countries, colonies, territories or protectorates were not part of the British Empire.
Pound, dates from being part of the British Empire