The Founders of the United States strongly favored republican government over democracy for a variety of reasons. Fundamentally, however, they were suspicious of pure 'rule by the people' (which is democracy) because of its instability and difficulty alike; they deliberately chose instead to establish America as a republic, which combines some features of democracy with parliamentarian (and oligarchic) government for the sake of a 'representative democracy.'
Ancient Rome created a system of government that can be called a republic. This concept was lost to the world until on the beginning of the US republic of 1789. The Roman republic was based on a written set of laws. The most basic way to explain their republic is to say that Rome had two houses of power. One was the body of two consuls elected annually by the citizens of Rome. The Senate was comprised of the aristocracy and appointed by magistrates.Rome also had a judicial system.
Please explain what you mean by rise to quality.
In Democracy, everyone is treated equally and has equal right, and say in everything by voting. In Communism, all property is public and things are given to people by the government only, according to their needs.
The united states was unique in the world as a democracy of people from many different nations
hurry up and find someone to answer this question
He claimed that Democracy allowed people to follow all their passions and drives without order or control. The Republic set up guidelines for a utopian society and then Plato used reason and logic to explain why this kind of society could not function and why a democratic republic enabled citizens to have the most possible freedom.
A republic is a government whereby a restricted group of citizens form a political unit while a democracy is government by the majority.
Politics then is different from politics now, as politics back then had less or no democracy, but politics now is way much democratic.
The Founders of the United States strongly favored republican government over democracy for a variety of reasons. Fundamentally, however, they were suspicious of pure 'rule by the people' (which is democracy) because of its instability and difficulty alike; they deliberately chose instead to establish America as a republic, which combines some features of democracy with parliamentarian (and oligarchic) government for the sake of a 'representative democracy.'
In a strict democracy, every individual has an equal vote in decision making such as elections and voting on policies and laws. A republic is similar to a democracy in that a majority vote wins, however, in a republic, representatives are the ones who vote, not the public. The US is a republic, not a democracy. Elected officials in congress "represent" their constituents when voting on matters. Arguably, this is a more practical form of democracy in that individuals cannot be thoroughly knowledgeable on all matters that need to be voted on thus the results should be more sound. Additionally, a national vote on every matter would be impractical. The downside is that if representatives don't vote in support of their constituents, the decisions may not reflect the wishes of the populous.
Ancient Rome created a system of government that can be called a republic. This concept was lost to the world until on the beginning of the US republic of 1789. The Roman republic was based on a written set of laws. The most basic way to explain their republic is to say that Rome had two houses of power. One was the body of two consuls elected annually by the citizens of Rome. The Senate was comprised of the aristocracy and appointed by magistrates.Rome also had a judicial system.
Yes, the rule of Pericles (circa 461-429 BCE) is often considered a golden age for Athens due to significant advancements in art, philosophy, and democracy. Under his leadership, Athens experienced a flourishing of culture, exemplified by the construction of the Parthenon and the works of playwrights like Sophocles and philosophers like Socrates. Pericles also expanded democratic participation, fostering a sense of civic pride and engagement among Athenian citizens. However, this period also set the stage for conflicts that would ultimately challenge Athenian power, such as the Peloponnesian War.
how are social division reflected in democratic counry
Anthony does not believe that she lives in a true democracy. She argues that the democratic ideals of equality and representation are not fulfilled, particularly for women and marginalized groups. Her advocacy for women's rights and suffrage highlights her belief that a genuine democracy should include the voices and rights of all citizens. Therefore, she views the current system as flawed and in need of significant reform.
I think you mean progressives.
freedom ,liberty ,and choice