There was more of a puritan tradition in the North. Also industrial employers could not use slaves; they needed free, mobile, skilled labour.
In the South, the cotton industry depended on large-scale manual labour, unpaid and captive.
does any body know the answer of this question: § "How was geographic location important to economic, social, and political development of ancient Rome?"
By 1837, the South felt increasingly isolated due to a combination of economic, social, and political factors. The region's heavy reliance on cotton and slavery created a distinct economic dependency that alienated it from the industrializing North, which was moving toward free labor and manufacturing. Additionally, growing abolitionist sentiment in the North and increasing tensions over slavery raised fears in the South about losing political power and cultural identity. This isolation was further exacerbated by the lack of significant rail and communication infrastructure compared to the North, hindering economic and social connections.
The social and economic battles fought during the civil war began with the Souths dependence on slave labor. Their economy depended on the good picked and farmed by the slave. The end of slavery threatened that way of life.
Texas generally supported slavery due to its agricultural economy, which relied heavily on plantation crops like cotton and tobacco that required a substantial labor force. The state's early settlers, many of whom came from slaveholding states, brought their pro-slavery sentiments with them. Additionally, the political and social structures in Texas were aligned with maintaining slavery, as it was seen as integral to economic prosperity and social hierarchy at the time.
Economic and social forces drove down both the North and the South in the early 19th century because of the wars. The wars caused changes between slavery and industry. It seen changes through civil rights activists and even roles changed for women in working settings all direct decendanced from economic and social forces.
Social, Economic, Geographic
By not allowing slavery, Georgia faced economic challenges as the state relied heavily on agricultural labor. This led to tensions with neighboring states that depended on slavery for their economies. Additionally, there were social and political conflicts due to differing views on the institution of slavery.
Americans were divided over abolitionism due to deep-rooted economic, cultural, and social factors. Many in the Northern states opposed slavery on moral grounds but were also concerned about the economic impact of freed slaves on labor markets. In the South, slavery was integral to the economy and social structure, leading to fierce resistance against abolitionist movements. Additionally, differing views on race and citizenship further complicated the debate, with many Americans holding prejudiced beliefs that influenced their stance on abolition.
does any body know the answer of this question: § "How was geographic location important to economic, social, and political development of ancient Rome?"
Do it
Slavery was often based on economic interests, racial prejudice, and social hierarchy. These factors combined to create a system where people were considered property and could be bought, sold, and exploited for labor.
your mother.
The northern and southern positions on slavery were primarily influenced by economic, social, and cultural factors. The South's agrarian economy relied heavily on slave labor for the production of cash crops like cotton and tobacco, leading to a strong defense of the institution. In contrast, the North's economy became increasingly industrialized and urbanized, fostering a growing abolitionist sentiment and a belief in free labor. Additionally, differing social structures and values contributed to the North's gradual movement toward abolition and the South's commitment to maintaining slavery.
Weber believed that social change is influenced by a variety of factors, including culture, ideas, and individual actions, while Marx focused primarily on economic factors such as class struggle and ownership of the means of production. Their differing emphasis led to disagreements about the central forces driving social change.
Slavery has existed throughout history due to economic, social, and political factors. It was often driven by the desire for cheap labor, conquest and domination of other cultures, and the belief in the superiority of one group over another. In various societies, slavery became ingrained in the social, political, and economic systems, perpetuating its existence.
Factors such as moral objections to slavery, economic changes making slavery less profitable, and increased opposition from abolitionist movements contributed to some states considering ending slavery. Additionally, political and social pressure also played a role in shifting attitudes towards abolishing slavery.
good