Certainly more than one Confederate general wanted to continue the war after Lee's surrender. Jefferson Davis also wanted to continue the war. The problem was that in April of 1865, the Confederate supply organization still provided the essentials for continued fighting however, it could have not continued much longer.All the essential main line railroads were broken, and the last four remaining ports of Charleston, Wilmington, Savannah and Mobile were closed down.
The one possible chance of sending a raid from the Army of Tennessee into the North had dim prospects.
The Fante Confederacy, established in the 19th century in what is now Ghana, ultimately failed due to internal divisions, lack of cohesive leadership, and external pressures from the British colonial authorities. Disagreements among member states over governance and trade policies weakened their unity. Additionally, the British sought to assert control over the region, leading to military confrontations that the Confederacy could not withstand. These factors combined resulted in the disintegration of the Confederacy by the late 1870s.
Union General Ulysses S. Grant's victories at Fort Donelson, Vicksburg, and Appomattox were facilitated by his strong leadership, effective strategy, and ability to adapt to changing circumstances. His use of combined arms tactics and aggressive assaults overwhelmed Confederate defenses, while his logistical planning ensured his troops were well-supplied. Additionally, Grant's determination and willingness to engage in prolonged campaigns helped him wear down Confederate forces, ultimately leading to their surrender. His strategic focus on key geographic locations and the disruption of enemy supply lines further contributed to his success.
Jefferson Davis faced several challenges that affected the Confederacy's outcome in the Civil War. His leadership was often criticized for being inflexible and overly centralized, which hindered effective military strategy and coordination. Additionally, the South's lack of resources, poor infrastructure, and reliance on slavery for its economy made it difficult to sustain a prolonged conflict against the better-equipped Union forces. Ultimately, these factors contributed to the Confederacy's defeat and Davis's inability to secure independence for the Southern states.
Britain considered joining the Confederacy during the American Civil War primarily due to its economic interests, particularly in cotton. The Southern states were major cotton producers, and British textile mills relied heavily on this supply. Additionally, there was a degree of sympathy for the Southern cause among some British elites, who viewed the Confederacy as a potential ally against rising American power. However, Britain ultimately decided to remain neutral, influenced by factors such as anti-slavery sentiment and the Union's diplomatic efforts.
Jefferson Davis struggled to govern as effectively as Abraham Lincoln due to several factors, including his leadership style and the Confederacy's lack of centralized authority. Davis was often seen as rigid and uncompromising, which hindered collaboration among the Southern states. In contrast, Lincoln's adept political skills and ability to unify disparate factions in the Union helped him navigate the complexities of war and governance more successfully. Additionally, the Confederacy faced significant resource limitations and internal divisions that further complicated Davis's efforts to lead.
send
Gerald J. Bostwick has written: 'Factors associated with continuance-discontinuance in family therapy'
Initially - doubts about the viability of the Confederacy. They wanted to back a winner. Ethical position over slavery - although the war was not originally about slavery, the Lancashire cotton workers said they would sacrifice their jobs, rather than support the Confederacy. Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation made it impossible for free nations abroad to support the South without looking pro-slavery themselves. Especially good diplomatic work by Lincoln's envoy in London - C.F. Adams (of the Presidential family).
It is impossible to determine what number has the most factors because there are an infinite number of numbers.
The answer is impossible; many factors affect this evaporation.
It is impossible for a population to exist if it does not have access to the required limiting factors, and one essential of those factors is they balance the number of population in an area.
Some historians cite the lack of a real and long term nationalism as one of many factors that hampered the South's war effort and led to its defeat. The South was united against the Republicans.Their long term loyalties were with the United States not to the Confederate States of America. The lack of nationalism led to many soldier desertions and the South still remained a viable military force even after Appomattox.
Since numbers don't stop, then factors don't stop, then proper factors don't stop. It's impossible to quantify an infinite answer.
Supporting the Confederacy would have led to outright war with the United States. It would have also caused labor issues, since the industrial workers sympathized with the slaves and were openly opposed to slavery, and some threatened to leave their jobs rather than support the slave holding Confederacy.
It is impossible to list the infinite number of composite odd numbers.
It will be impossible to answer this question accurately without knowing what the questioner wants to determine.
If you don't specify a number, it becomes an infinite list, impossible to calculate.