Most people didn't directly question the great chain of being but were more discrete. Philosphers wrote books about it trying to send messages. This became a serious a issue in the turn of the 15th to 16h century when books and resources became more available. More people became aware and started questioning The Great Chain of Being but no one revolted until later on. Most people are punished if they question the Great Chain of Being as they are acting on 'free will' instead of obeying the people above them. Back during those times, it was everyones 'fate' to follow it.
No -- not when it is being used as a noun phrase by itself. ("She was at the bottom of the chain of command.") However, you would hyphenated it if this noun phrase was being used to modify a noun that came after it: "The ship was plagued by chain-of-command issues." "The comapny had to clarify its chain-of-command policy."
Men are above women in the Elizabethan chain.
I think it was The Great Depression. Trying to support the troops and everyone dying didn't help and the government eventually (almost) ran out of money, therefore creating a chain effect. From businesses losing funding from the government and then having to sack workers because they could not pay them. The Depression ended around when World War II happened, then everybody went to war and was able to bring in money. Other government ideas happened, like working and getting food coupons to get food.
1. If one fails to recognize that there always exists a chain of command, they fall into the danger of being responsible for something that is beyond their capacity. 2. One can loose the protection that is instilled and inherited in a chain of command structure. 3. Creates confusion to other associates as to who is accountable for what and brings over-all morale in an orgination down.
because of his relentless determination and because his discovery started a chain of events that would lead to the founding of a new nation of freedom for all.
The narrator is supposedly testifying at a Senate investigation and is being questioned by a US Senator.
The narrator is supposedly testifying at a Senate investigation and is being questioned by a US Senator.
The narrator is supposedly testifying at a Senate investigation and is being questioned by a US Senator.
Aristotle
The concept of the great chain of being, which structured all entities in a hierarchical order, viewed disruption as leading to chaos and disorder. Breaking this chain was seen as upsetting the natural order, resulting in metaphysical and physical consequences such as societal upheaval, moral decay, and cosmic imbalance. It was believed that the harmony and stability of the universe depended on the integrity of this hierarchical system.
The great chain of being is the .. something something something of the something something something Idiot ^
Queen Elizabeth
Daniel Defoe would rank cannibals just under the "Man" ranking in the Great Chain of Being.
Daniel Defoe would rank cannibals just under the "Man" ranking in the Great Chain of Being.
her place was in the slavery part
it lead to chaos
No, the concept of the Great Chain of Being was developed by Neoplatonist philosophers such as Plotinus and later embraced by Christian theologians like Thomas Aquinas. Aristotle's ideas did influence the concept, but he did not create it himself.