as a non-citizen, Scott did not have the right to file suit in federal court
The Chief US Supreme Justice at the time of the Dred Scott decision was Justice Taney. He wrote the majority decision that proclaimed that Blacks in the USA could never be citizens. It was a 7 to 2 decision.
The Chief Justice was Roger Taney - ironically a one-time Abolitionist.
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney referenced the Declaration of Independence to argue that the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were not extended to African Americans, whom he deemed "not included" among the people the Declaration aimed to protect. He asserted that the framers of the Constitution viewed blacks as inferior and therefore not entitled to citizenship or the rights that accompanied it. Taney's interpretation reinforced the prevailing racial prejudices of the time, ultimately denying Scott's claim to freedom and citizenship.
President Andrew Jackson nominated Chief Justice Roger B. Taney to the Supreme Court in 1836, where he served until 1864. Taney is best remembered for presiding over the Dred Scott case (Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)) that held slaves and their descendants could never be citizens of the United States.
The Dred Scott Case, during the Civil War, was a large controversy about African America rights and freedoms and whether they applied in "free states" that didn't allow slavery. See answer to "Who was Dred Scott" :)
Roger B. Taney was the Chief Justice of the United States during the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. He delivered the majority opinion in the case, which ruled against Dred Scott's petition for freedom.
The chief justice in the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney.
No, the captain of the nine-judge team, Chief Justice Roger Taney, delivered the majority opinion in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case which ruled against Dred Scott's petition for freedom. Taney's decision stated that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be considered American citizens.
In the Dred Scott Case, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dred Scott, as a black person, did not have the right to sue in federal court because he was considered property, not a citizen. Taney also declared that the Missouri Compromise, which prohibited slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional.
Roger Taney
You mean who was Dred Scott's owner. (Taney was the Chief Justice who issued the Supreme Court verdict.) Scott had been owned by an army officer, who had since died. Scott was left as propertyin his will to the brother-in-law called Sandford.
The Dred Scott decision and a philosophy of judicial restraint
No, Judge Roger Taney, gave the verdict of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford's case.
Yes, the elderly Taney was Chief Justice, and he had framed those words about the status of black people that so angered the Abolitionists.
yea
Roger Taney
Roger Taney - ironically a one-tme abolitionist.