1. Describe
- Observe the time period, artist, type of art, major events that correspond to the art, literal interpretation of the piece of art, descriptions of colors, shapes and edges, the lines and types of lines, textures, overall effect and emotions associated with the art piece
2. Analyze
- Analyze the usage of color, lines shapes, and emotions and what the intended effect is, why shapes and colors were used, how is it meant to emotionally effect the viewer? How were the intended effects achieved?
3. Interpretation
- Ask yourselves questions such as what was the intended meaning? Does it effect you the way it was intended by the artist? Was symbolism used in the piece? Why did the artist chose this method and why did the artist create this work?
4. Judgement
- Try to objectively consider everything you've already concluded and decide what you think the intrinsic value is? The emotional affect it will have on others, was it poorly focused? It the meaning not apparent?
As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.
Art criticism is the discussion or evaluation of visual art. Art critics usually criticize art in the context of aesthetics or the theory of beauty. This requires a sound knowledge of art and the history of art and demands objective critical analysis of the work/s in question, therefore being far from an easy task, since it implies much more than just giving your personal opinion on the matter.
As long as there has been commercial art, there has been art critics. Sometimes the criticism comes from the general public and religious or political groups. Sometimes art is criticized because it is concerned technically 'bad" Whistler's painting "Nocturne in Black and gold: The Falling Rocket" was said to have been like, "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face". When the abstract art movement first began, many thought that the artists of the works simply lacked skills Sometimes the art was criticized because of the subject matter. the Impressionist were often criticized due to their painting of everyday subject matter. Currently, most art that gets the greatest criticism is that art which is considered politically incorrect or vulgar such as art which depicts someone urinating on a cross. Everyone has an opinion, everyone has a criticism ... some good and some bad. But as long as there is art, there will be art critics.
Deconstuction
imitationalism
In "Approval of Art Criticism," the method employed is effective in conveying the message by blending personal reflections with critical analysis, allowing readers to engage with the subjective nature of art. This dual approach fosters a deeper understanding of both the artwork and the critic's perspective, encouraging a dialogue about aesthetic value. Additionally, the use of accessible language makes the critique relatable, inviting a broader audience to appreciate the nuances of art criticism. Overall, the method enhances the message's resonance and impact.
The Feldman-Mittler phenomenological method of art criticism focuses on interpreting artwork by exploring the viewer's subjective experience and emotional response to the piece. It emphasizes understanding how the artwork affects the viewer's perception and consciousness, delving into the deeper meanings and connections that arise through the act of viewing.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
Western criticism focuses on theory and the philosophy of art.
Terry Michael Barrett has written: 'Interpreting art' -- subject(s): Art criticism 'Criticizing art' -- subject(s): American Art, Art criticism, History
Diderot's "Salons" had a significant impact on art criticism by emphasizing subjective responses and the importance of the viewer's experience. He advocated for art that evoked emotion and challenged traditional hierarchies in art. Diderot's writings are considered foundational for the development of modern art criticism.
As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.
Jerzy Stajuda has written: 'O obrazach i innych takich' -- subject(s): Art, History and criticism, Art appreciation, Art criticism