answersLogoWhite

0

1. Describe

- Observe the time period, artist, type of art, major events that correspond to the art, literal interpretation of the piece of art, descriptions of colors, shapes and edges, the lines and types of lines, textures, overall effect and emotions associated with the art piece

2. Analyze

- Analyze the usage of color, lines shapes, and emotions and what the intended effect is, why shapes and colors were used, how is it meant to emotionally effect the viewer? How were the intended effects achieved?

3. Interpretation

- Ask yourselves questions such as what was the intended meaning? Does it effect you the way it was intended by the artist? Was symbolism used in the piece? Why did the artist chose this method and why did the artist create this work?

4. Judgement

- Try to objectively consider everything you've already concluded and decide what you think the intrinsic value is? The emotional affect it will have on others, was it poorly focused? It the meaning not apparent?

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

When you examine a work of art should you begin with the art criticism or the art history?

As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.


Explain art criticism as an art?

Art criticism is the discussion or evaluation of visual art. Art critics usually criticize art in the context of aesthetics or the theory of beauty. This requires a sound knowledge of art and the history of art and demands objective critical analysis of the work/s in question, therefore being far from an easy task, since it implies much more than just giving your personal opinion on the matter.


Why was art critized?

As long as there has been commercial art, there has been art critics. Sometimes the criticism comes from the general public and religious or political groups. Sometimes art is criticized because it is concerned technically 'bad" Whistler's painting "Nocturne in Black and gold: The Falling Rocket" was said to have been like, "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face". When the abstract art movement first began, many thought that the artists of the works simply lacked skills Sometimes the art was criticized because of the subject matter. the Impressionist were often criticized due to their painting of everyday subject matter. Currently, most art that gets the greatest criticism is that art which is considered politically incorrect or vulgar such as art which depicts someone urinating on a cross. Everyone has an opinion, everyone has a criticism ... some good and some bad. But as long as there is art, there will be art critics.


What method of art analysis considers the underlying unconscious meaning of an artwork?

Deconstuction


What term implies the criticism that art is only successful if its content depicts a literal representation of an image?

imitationalism

Related Questions

In Approval of Art Criticism. How effective is the method used in conveying the message?

In "Approval of Art Criticism," the method employed is effective in conveying the message by blending personal reflections with critical analysis, allowing readers to engage with the subjective nature of art. This dual approach fosters a deeper understanding of both the artwork and the critic's perspective, encouraging a dialogue about aesthetic value. Additionally, the use of accessible language makes the critique relatable, inviting a broader audience to appreciate the nuances of art criticism. Overall, the method enhances the message's resonance and impact.


What is the Feldman-Mittler phenomenological method of art criticism?

The Feldman-Mittler phenomenological method of art criticism focuses on interpreting artwork by exploring the viewer's subjective experience and emotional response to the piece. It emphasizes understanding how the artwork affects the viewer's perception and consciousness, delving into the deeper meanings and connections that arise through the act of viewing.


What is the main element that sets western art criticism apart from that of the rest of the world?

Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.


What differs Western art criticism from other traditions of critique?

Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy


What differentiates Western art criticism from other traditions of critique?

Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.


What differentiates western art criticism from other traditions critique?

Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.


What differentiates art criticism from other traditions traditions of critique?

Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.


What is the main element that sets art criticism apart from that of the rest of the world?

Western criticism focuses on theory and the philosophy of art.


What has the author Terry Michael Barrett written?

Terry Michael Barrett has written: 'Interpreting art' -- subject(s): Art criticism 'Criticizing art' -- subject(s): American Art, Art criticism, History


What effect did Dennis Diderot have on the field of art of criticism?

Diderot's "Salons" had a significant impact on art criticism by emphasizing subjective responses and the importance of the viewer's experience. He advocated for art that evoked emotion and challenged traditional hierarchies in art. Diderot's writings are considered foundational for the development of modern art criticism.


When you examine a work of art should you begin with the art criticism or the art history?

As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.


What has the author Jerzy Stajuda written?

Jerzy Stajuda has written: 'O obrazach i innych takich' -- subject(s): Art, History and criticism, Art appreciation, Art criticism