I have a dreaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam speech - MLK Jr.
he was a great speech man, means he was good with words
yes he is a world famous leader because he invaided all the countries we didnt need knew exactly how to treat his men and now loads of war men are calling him their leader.
The term supreme leader is most likely to be used in a military dictatorship. Kim Jong Il of North Korea would be a good example of a supreme leader.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
Harald Hardrada was a good candidate for king because he was already the king of Norway he was also a relative of a last king, he was also an experienced leader.
He is a good leader because he is Kobe Bryant.
he was a great speech man, means he was good with words
you don't, he is a very good political leader
Bill Clinton was very famous (for good and bad reasons).
Martin Luther King, Jr. would be a good inspirational leader for a school project or speech. Some other examples include Mahatma Gandhi, and Mother Teresa.
It is important for parties to choose a good leader as a candidate because they want their candidate to win. A good leader will have a better chance of beating the other candidate.
for participating in the army and being a good leader
he is one of the good political leader who have done many good things for the society for the jharkhand
He was a famous Spanish Explorer
yes he is a world famous leader because he invaided all the countries we didnt need knew exactly how to treat his men and now loads of war men are calling him their leader.
she was a good women political leader. she seen every one as equal
A speech given by someone fighting for freedom which then becomes famous.