Yes, they were. Especially at the onset of the war, when many countries had not yet achieved full mechanization of their forces.
no
because they are such good things
mechanization and overproduction
yes
A much higher mortality rate
Yes, they were. Especially at the onset of the war, when many countries had not yet achieved full mechanization of their forces.
Mechanization Takes Command was created in 1983.
Mechanization is the use of machines to do work instead of a human. Two advantages of mechanization are saving on the cost of labor and no risk of human error.
Agricultural mechanization is uses of methods to increase the amount of yield and for farming easily
Many people lost their jobs due to mechanization of car production
no
Farm mechanization can be classified into three main categories: primary, secondary, and tertiary mechanization. Primary mechanization involves the use of machinery for initial land preparation and planting, such as plows and seeders. Secondary mechanization includes operations like cultivation, irrigation, and pest control, utilizing equipment such as harrows and sprayers. Tertiary mechanization focuses on post-harvest activities, including harvesting, processing, and transportation, employing machinery like combines and threshers.
Probably due to the increased mechanization of the combatant forces. But frankly, the production of national industries was a key factor in many conflicts prior to the first world war.
N. Kozyrev has written: 'Agricultural mechanization' 'Economic aspects of the mechanization of dairy farms'
Luddites
The growing mechanization of industry is decreasing the importance of personnel management?comment