Most countries have signed agreements that biological agents will not be used in warfare so biological warfare is unlikely especially given that some of the countries who are big believers in no biowarfare are nuclear capable. Bioterrorism is more likely as people acting independently of government/state can do what they feel fit. Also the word "terrorism" gives a clue as to the objective. The threat of bioterrorism achieves the goal of terrorising even if the terrorists lack the capablility of producing a weapon which would cause serious harm. At present the world is "terrorised" by the threat of a naturally occurring strain of the flu virus the idea of bioterrorism can easily feed off these ideas and create conspiracy theories and terror.
They have been used but only to a limited extent. The difficulty is acquiring them and handling them safely. There is also the problem of transportation to the target. They require much more detailed knowledge than conventional weapons.
The more we know about the past, the more prepared we are for the future
because of chemical warfare.
WW1 introduced submarine warfare, tanks, chemical warfare, and aerial combat. Man's history already knew battleship warfare from Tsushima in 1905; and massed land warfare consisting of infantry. WW2 REFINED submarine warfare, tanks, and aerial warfare; chemical warfare was outlawed by treaty.
Because guns and cannons are much more effective.
The use of biological agents, such as pathogenic organisms or agricultural pests, for terrorist purposes. OR Terrorism using the weapons of biological warfare. OR Terrorism that relies on spreading diseases, such as anthrax and smallpox. OR The use of biological agents as weapons of terror. Anthrax bacteria are one such agent, while smallpox is considered one of the more likely lethal viruses that could serve as a weapon of bioterror.
Because it is more resistant to biological and environmental destruction.
children are more likely to be valued by their biological fathers than by their stepfathers.
Bioweapons are weapons made out of microorganisms, such as anthrax, small pox, or tularemia, and they were used because they were a possible weapon against other countries. If you'd like to know more about biological weapons and biological warfare I suggest you read Biohazard, by Ken Alibeck, an amazing insight into the bioweapons produced by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
Which method may be used to deliver biological warfare agents
Unconstrained captors Terrorists, or kidnappers.
Biological Warfare has been attempted for thousands of years. During WW1/2, people that caught diseases were sent into the enemy camps to infect the enemies. There has also been a lot more times when it has been used, look it up on google, there's tons of info. Hope this helps.
I assume you were expecting to include a list, but the answer is more than likely protein
Yes November 2011 release date More likely, mainly because the modern warfare 2 was open ended.
"No, the developers are not going to make Modern Warfare 2 Wii." Actually this is a lie, Nintendo and the developers have been talking and there will most likely be a Modern Warfare 2 for the Wii. Quote:"However, Activision at GC 09 has said that if Modern Warfare, which was just announced a few days ago that it will be appearing on the Wii, does well on the we they'll most likely want to bring Modern Warfare 2 to the Wii as well." This has not yet been confirmed though, so its likely but is more unknown.
Biological evidence is much more likely to degrade and become unusable before physical evidence does.
Autism isn't more likely in a smoking pregnancy. Autism is a neurological difference, just like with any other biological variation it comes down to genetics.