The term, scientific religion, is an oxymoron. There is no such thing.
Egyptology is not a religion. Egyptology is the scientific study of Ancient Egyptian culture and artifacts.
Scientists began to rely on religion for scientific answers
Louis Pasteur was a devout Roman Catholic. His faith influenced both his personal life and his scientific work, as he often spoke about the harmony between science and religion. Pasteur believed that his scientific discoveries were a way to understand and appreciate God's creation.
Scientists began to rely on religion for scientific answers.
Parapsychology is a scientific discipline, recognized in the U.S. by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and generally recognized worldwide as a legitimate scientific endeavour. Parapsychology studies some issues in religion as part of a multi-disciplinary set of interests, but the primary research areas focus on Extrasenory Perception and studies of Psychokinesis. So it is doubtful that Frederick William I believed that Parapsychology was a religion per se.
Society for the Scientific Study of Religion was created in 1949.
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion was created in 1961.
No, it is scientific theory
Of course its jainism
I have the general impression that the increase in scientific knowledge has had a tendency to reduce interest in religion, or even belief in God.
Egyptology is not a religion. Egyptology is the scientific study of Ancient Egyptian culture and artifacts.
Victorians did have religion although many had waning feelings towards religion. They were starting to get interested in scientific things which made it harder for them to have full faith in religion.
Mostly that would be religion and politics.
All of them.
No it was purely egyptian religion
The word is used by religious critics of science, accusing scientific thinking of being its own religion.
Mostly that would be religion and politics.