The "first" New Deal dealt with mostly immediate measures of getting the unemployed back to work and providing welfare and recovery. As the Depression continued, FDR began to feel the heat of his critics, both left (Huey Long, Share the Wealth, Charles Townsend, socialists) and right (conservative businessmen, laissez-faire supporters, anti NIRA regulations). To combat these critics, FDR proposed a new set of economic and social measures to fight unemployment and poverty, and to provide real jobs to decrease the unemployment rate. Examples of the Second New Deal included the WPA, which was the major relief agency of the New Deal. It was to provide work, not welfare. The major new piece of legislation during the Second New Deal was the Social Security Act of 1935. It provided insurance for the aged, unemployed, and disabled and it was based on contributions by both employers and employees.
NO: the New Deal was a stimulus package that was put into effect during the Great Depression.
There was no 2nd Great Depression. Many thought the Great Recession would be a great depression but that was not the case. In reality, the economy was not even close to another great depression. The great depression included such things as wage fixing and pricing fixing by the government, excess public debt from WW1, Smoot-Hawley act, etc. The Great Recession was just a financial breakdown, which is bad, but not a GD.
Dear Asker,The great depression caused a lot of tragedy in many people's hearts. There are various examples of what it caused in America:Loss of food...Loss of home...Loss of LIVES!As you see, that is a very sad time period and I doubt you would appreciate living in it. So that is why so many people are grateful that the great depression is over! I am, and I hope you are, too!The phrase, 'Great Depression' is an oxymoron. It wasn't really great, as it was a depression.You are welcome!Correction when they say great depression what they mean is that a great amount or a large amount was depressed.
1st new deal
new deal
NO: the New Deal was a stimulus package that was put into effect during the Great Depression.
There was no 2nd Great Depression. Many thought the Great Recession would be a great depression but that was not the case. In reality, the economy was not even close to another great depression. The great depression included such things as wage fixing and pricing fixing by the government, excess public debt from WW1, Smoot-Hawley act, etc. The Great Recession was just a financial breakdown, which is bad, but not a GD.
Dear Asker,The great depression caused a lot of tragedy in many people's hearts. There are various examples of what it caused in America:Loss of food...Loss of home...Loss of LIVES!As you see, that is a very sad time period and I doubt you would appreciate living in it. So that is why so many people are grateful that the great depression is over! I am, and I hope you are, too!The phrase, 'Great Depression' is an oxymoron. It wasn't really great, as it was a depression.You are welcome!Correction when they say great depression what they mean is that a great amount or a large amount was depressed.
To combat critics, who saw the economy declining in the mid 1930s, FDR proposed a new set of economic and social measures to fight unemployment and poverty, and to provide real jobs to decrease the unemployment rate. Examples of the Second New Deal included the WPA, which was the major relief agency of the New Deal. It was to provide work, not welfare. The major new piece of legislation during the Second New Deal was the Social Security Act of 1935. It provided insurance for the aged, unemployed, and disabled and it was based on contributions by both employers and employees.
Not a great deal. Multiply it by itself and divide by 4. If x is imaginary, x2 is negative.
1st new deal
2nd new deal
new deal
It was part of the first new deal.
I think he may well have done. It is known that Machiavelli did know about the works of the Greek philosophers who put out a great deal of work during the 2nd century BCE. This was also the time of Ashoka the Great of the Maurya Dynasty. It is known that Ashoka was strongly influenced by the Arthashastra and he also had a great deal of contact with the Greek Philosophers of the time. It therefore seems highly likely (at least in my view) that Niccolò Machiavelli gained some knowledge of the Arthashastra during his study of Greek Philosophy. I would go further than that though. It is my conjecture that Machiavelli was adept at plagiarizing the Arthashastra. If this is true then works such the his masterpiece the Prince should be attributed to Chāṇakya (c.350 -383 BCE).
Germany. With the depression came the rise of the NAZI party and the outbreak of the Second World War. Without Germany there would have been no major conflict in the 2nd half of the century. The Soviets would not have been able to dominate Eastern Europe as much as they did. Maybe an arms race, maybe not... It goes on and on.
yes