Fred Korematsu sued the United States because he thought it was unlawful for the United States to order Japanese-American citizens into concentration camps. The concentration camps were instituted after the bombing of Pearl Harbor during World War II.
The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.
I believe that this case is against the constitution and is racist and should not be allowed. For one reason say we were to go to war with England i bet that they wouldn't throw every white person in a camp.
Korematsu v. United States
The case of Korematsu v. United States (1944) is significant as it upheld the government's decision to intern Japanese Americans during World War II, citing national security concerns. This ruling has been widely criticized for its endorsement of racial discrimination and the violation of civil liberties. It serves as a poignant reminder of the dangers of prejudice and the importance of safeguarding constitutional rights, particularly during times of crisis. The case is often referenced in discussions about civil rights and government overreach.
The US won
The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.
Omg based god !
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone (1941-1946) presided over the Court for the Korematsu case, a challenge to the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 that established Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v United States (1944) remains a profound case and precedent in the study of civil liberties and American Constitutional law. The chief significance was the Courts majority opinion that national security (against espionage) was a compelling interest enough that the use of internment was/is justified.
Supreme Court Case Korematsu V. United States (1944)
Fred Korematsu is significant for his courageous stance against the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. He defied the government's orders and was subsequently arrested, leading to a landmark Supreme Court case, Korematsu v. United States, which upheld the internment at the time. His case later became a symbol of civil rights violations, and Korematsu's legacy has since inspired discussions about justice, civil liberties, and the importance of challenging government actions that may infringe on individual rights. In 2018, he was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, further recognizing his contributions to civil rights advocacy.
This was a case determining the constitutionality of putting Japanese Americans into "relocation" camps or internment camps. The Supreme Court decided that internment camps were constitutional because of military urgency, and that protection from espionage far outweighed Korematsu's (and thus all Japanese American's) individual rights.
I believe that this case is against the constitution and is racist and should not be allowed. For one reason say we were to go to war with England i bet that they wouldn't throw every white person in a camp.
The case that restricted Japanese Americans' rights during World War II by placing them in internment camps is C) Korematsu v. US. In this 1944 Supreme Court decision, the Court upheld the government's decision to intern Japanese Americans, citing national security concerns during wartime. This ruling has since been widely criticized for its endorsement of racial discrimination and the violation of civil liberties.