0
it was a danger because if the nullification was passed, then whatever law the government had put on a state and then a state doesn't like the law, they can just use the nullification. this would lessen the power of the government and eventually, the U.S. would separate on their own. *note* I'm not sure of this answer, but i believe it's one of the reasons. im only an 8th grader anyways.
-SCL 2010 graduate! whoopie!
What else can I help you with?
In 1833 South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union if what?
the Supreme Court rejected the principle of nullification. -GRADPOINT
Why did Andrew Jackson support states' rights in the case of the native Americans but not the nullification crisis?
Because he absolutely hated John C. Calhoun the leader of the nullification movement in south Carolina. Preservation of the Union was also important to him.
How did southerners view the idea of state rights and nullification?
north= nullification is good south= nullification is bad
Did john c calhoun want the south to secede?
No, Calhoun was an advocate for the growth and expansion of the Union. He brought back the idea of nullification by a state - of a federal law, following the passage of the Tariff of 1828. Because the tariff was detrimental to the wellbeing of the state, he believed the state had the right to nullification. Secession was not an idea proposed in the South Carolina Exposition and Protest (which stated the Doctrine of Nullification).
How would the practice of nullification threaten the union?
The practice of nullification, where states claim the right to invalidate federal laws, threatens the union by undermining federal authority and creating a patchwork of laws across states. It can lead to conflicts between state and federal governments, eroding the principle of a cohesive national policy. If states can selectively ignore federal mandates, it risks disunity and could encourage further secessionist sentiments, ultimately destabilizing the union. This challenges the fundamental concept of a united nation governed by a central authority.
What was john c calhoun's solution to the tariff of abominations?
Doctrine of Nullification and South Carolina threatened to succeed from the Union.
Jackson's attitude toward nullification was to?
Andrew Jackson was devoted to the Union. This meant that his attitude toward nullification was negative, and he opposed it.
What was Jacksons response to the Nullification Crisis?
He admitted that the Union was a compact of states.
What was Andrew Jackson's response to the nullification crisis?
He admitted that the Union was a compact of states.
What was calhouns nullification theory?
Calhoun's nullification theory was that if the federal government refused to permit a state to nullify a federal law, the state had the right to withdraw from the Union.
What was the idea of nullification?
The main idea of nullification was give every state a right to invalidate any federal acts which was viewed as unconstitutional. This was also a way to preserve the union.
The main idea of nullification was what?
The main idea of nullification was give every state a right to invalidate any federal acts which was viewed as unconstitutional. This was also a way to preserve the union.
What main ideas of the nullification?
The main idea of nullification was give every state a right to invalidate any federal acts which was viewed as unconstitutional. This was also a way to preserve the union.
What was main idea of nullification?
The main idea of nullification was give every state a right to invalidate any federal acts which was viewed as unconstitutional. This was also a way to preserve the union.
Which state started a crisis for the union in 1833 when it threatened to secede?
South Carolina threatened to secede in 1833 with the Nullification Act.
Why did Webster and Jackson oppose nullification?
Webster and Jackson opposed nullification because they believed that it undermined the authority of the federal government and threatened the stability of the Union. They argued that only the federal courts, not individual states, had the authority to interpret and enforce the Constitution. They believed that nullification would lead to the disintegration of the Union and ultimately weaken the power of the federal government.
In 1833 South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union if what?
the Supreme Court rejected the principle of nullification. -GRADPOINT
