They are two very similar fighter planes used by the RAF during World War 2 but designed and built by different firms. Hawker's "Hurricane" had good maneuverability, and was armed with 4 20mm cannons. It's top speed was 340 MPH. The Spitfire had superbmaneuverability, was armed with 4 .303 machine guns and 2 20mm cannons, and had a top speed of 378 MPH. Both were excellent fighter planes. The Spitfire got "better press", but in truth 60% of the German planes shot down in the Battle of Britain were shot down by Hurricanes.
A Spitfire was a British fighter plane during World War 2 and a Messerschmitt was a German fighter.
Spitfire and Hurricane.
In a dogfight between a Zero and a Spitfire, the Spitfire would likely have the advantage due to its superior speed and maneuverability.
The Spitfire and Hurricane were both very famous, but the Spitfire more so. Let's not forget the Lancaster and Halifax bombers and the long-range Sunderland flying-boat! There were others, too (e.g. Mosquito) but these will do for now.
RAF Fighter Command's primary fighters used in the Battle of Britain was the Hawker Hurricane and the Supermarine Spitfire.There were far more Hurricane's available and they proved effective against German bombers as well as fighters, however the Spitfire was more agile and a preferred choice to engage German fighters.
the spitfire is slightly faster but the hurricane had bigger guns which might have slowed it down.
The Supermarine Spitfire was faster than the Hawker Hurricane, with a top speed of over 360 mph compared to the Hurricane's top speed of around 340 mph. The Spitfire also had better overall performance characteristics, making it a more capable fighter aircraft.
A Spitfire was a British fighter plane during World War 2 and a Messerschmitt was a German fighter.
I know one of them is the Supermarine Spitfire II
The only difference between a hurricane, a cyclone, and a typhoon is the location where the storm occurs.
the difference is that the australian scale has no category
Spitfire and Hurricane fighters
The Spitfire is a much more famous aircraft than the Hurricane and in so many ways was undeniably superior.The Spitfire was faster, considerably faster and was far better constructed. The Hurricane, however was far more maneuverable, had a greater range and a higher operating ceiling.The Spitfire had 8 machine guns whilst the Hurricane had a mere 4. The Hurricane was outdated before it even saw service and was effectively a follow on to First World War airplanes where as the Spitfire was the first of a more modern style of plane.All things considered it would be a very close thing. In the end it would come down to the pilots involved. The Hurricane was outclassed by virtually all the German craft it faced and yet still won through. The Spitfire too punched well above its weightclass.It should be easy. It should be the Spitfire. Instead we are declaring it a draw and are putting it down to the pilots on the day.
Both were formidable RAF fighters in WW II. The Hurry was built largely of wood with a fabric covering, while the Spit was built from metal with a high-strength aluminum covering. The Spit, or at least the later ones, had a higher-visibility canopy.
The Spitfire and The Hurricane
Spitfire, Hurricane and Lancaster are 3 of the most well known.
A hurricane is a "named storm". If you do not have a named storm exclusion then your wind coverage will cover hurricane damage.