the mercator projection lines are straight but the robinsons are curved
The difference between a shogun and a samurai is like the difference between a king and a knight.
there is no difference between this two...
A question about "the difference between" requires two objects!
Explain the difference between the vassals and the serfs
the difference between a number and 3 is
Most modern cartographers prefer the Robinson projection over the Mercator projection because it provides a more visually accurate representation of the Earth's continents and oceans. The Robinson projection minimizes distortion in size, shape, and distance, making it more suitable for world maps. In contrast, the Mercator projection significantly enlarges areas near the poles, which can mislead viewers about the relative sizes of countries and regions. Overall, the Robinson projection strikes a better balance between various types of distortion, making it more effective for general reference.
Mercator projection distorts the size of land masses, resulting in high distortion near the poles. Equal area projections maintain accurate land area proportions, making them useful for representing data like population density.
The Winkel Tripel projection is an equal-area map projection that reduces distortion compared to the Mercator projection, which is a conformal projection that preserves shapes but distorts sizes, particularly near the poles. The Winkel Tripel projection balances both shape and size distortions, making it more visually appealing for displaying global data, while the Mercator projection is often used for navigation due to its straight rhumb lines.
A Mercator projection map is the most familiar and common to usage in primary education systems. Mercator projections model the continents and oceans into a flattened and rolled cylindrical format. In comparison a Gnomonic projection is also two dimensional and flat but it uses lines which are actual representation of point-to-point s indicating true distance. Another significant difference is scale as Mercator's can represent the entire earth whereas Gnomonics represent a geographical limited area. Lastly Mercator's have the difference of distortion and under representing the actual sizes of Greenland and Continental Africa.
Mercator is not a map, but a map projection, i.e. a way of representing the continents on a map. The Mercator projection is only accurate between 30 degrees north and south latitude. The further away you go from that point, the greater the exaggeration.
Mercator projection distorts size and shape as you move away from the Equator, giving a more accurate representation of shapes near the poles. Azimuthal projection preserves direction and distance from a central point, making it useful for navigation and measuring distances from a specific point on the map.
Mercator Projection : longitude and latitude as straight, parallel lines Conic Projection : a circular map made from a flattened cone, centered on a pole or other point Gall-Peters Projection : relocates standard parallels, narrows longitudinal spacing Robinson Projection : approximates a true spherical view of the Earth, except the poles Winkel Tripel Projection : an azimuth approximation of the world view, similar to Robinson The most widely used is the Mercator projection, the major disadvantage being its area expansions (areas closer to the poles appear larger and lack their true shapes). The Gall-Peters Projection provides a closer approximation of the relative areas. All flat representations of a spherical surface will create variances in "true" size or shape. (see image links)
its between Topographic and mercator projection
Google Maps uses WGS-84 Web Mercator which is a slight variation of the Mercator projection.Google Earth uses Simple Cylindrical (Plate Carree) projection with a WGS84 datum for its imagery base.
Meridians on the Mercator projection are straight lines that run from the North Pole to the South Pole at equal intervals, spaced evenly along the equator. As they approach the poles, the spacing between meridians shrinks, causing distortion in size, shape, and distance of land masses near the poles. This distortion is a common characteristic of the Mercator projection, which makes it ideal for navigation but less suitable for accurately representing areas and distances at high latitudes.
The difference between Mercator's and Peter's projection is that Mercator's projection blew up the size of powerful nations as size = power, in addition to this Mercator's projection allowed cartographers to produce charts from which sailors could navigate because his projection preserved shape and direction. IN contrast Peter did not really care about navigation, but rather restoring weaker, less powerful nations to their rightful size. The only problem with this was that sailors couldn't use Peter's projection for navigation, and his projection bought up a lot of controversy between educational and religious borders - some schools used Mercator's and some schools used Peter's/ some nations rejected peters projection and some nations accepted Peter's projection, etc.
No because the Mercator projection distorts the size and shape of large objects, as the scale increases from the Equator to the poles, where it becomes infinite.