0
hurray!!!
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The Pentagon is the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense and is located in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C. It is a large five-sided building that houses offices and facilities for the defense department's operations and personnel. The Pentagon is a symbol of the U.S. military and serves as a command center for military planning and coordination.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many sides does a three dimensional penagon have?
Assuming you mean a pentagon - not penagon, a 3-dimensional pentagon is a dodecahedron which has 12 faces.
How many sides does a Penagon have?
5 sides
What type of prism has five sides?
penagon
How many sides dose a penagon have?
A pentagon has 5 sides.
How many angles dose a penagon have?
it has 5 sides and 5 angles
What has five sides and five corners?
A penagon is a shape with five sides and five corners.
What important events happened in 2000?
The 1st day of the 2000 Al Qaeda Summit.
Why does a square truncated pyramid support more weight than a penagon pyramid?
Assuming that you mean pentagon, not pentagon, the answer is simply that a truncated pyramid has a flat top which can support weight easily whereas a pentagon pyramid would require a very fine balancing act.
JKLMN is a regular pentagon and the diagonal JL and JM are joined because of the symmetry of the pentagon all three triangles are isosceles and the left and right triangles are congruent calculate?
the all 5 sides of pentagon are identical , so all the sides are equal to each other now D is the point which is the center of the pentagon , so the bisector drawns of the angles are equal to each other therefore all the sides of the penagon are equal which says that the equilateral triangles has all the sides equal therefore the triangles are equilateral triangles
Did giant humans exist?
(3) On June 7, 2010 at 2:51 am User:Nij[677] said:Several amounts of nonsense removed from answer; claims unsupported by evidence are not sufficient when discussing physical history.(2) On June 7, 2010 at 2:46 am User:Nij[677] said:There are not three feet in a cubit. there are not even two modern feet in a cubit. Right from the get-go, your source is spouting bollocks. "Skeletons ranging from 9 to 36 feet tall have been found". Yes, right, so where's the evidence? Oh, locked away, you say? well, how the f*** do you know it's there then?!Claims made. No evidence. Claims that evidence is "hidden" or "destroyed before it can be tested".>> If there's no evidence to be tested, how can you make claims about it?>> If it's hidden away, how can you claim to have tested it, to make claims about it?If everyone you knew was five feet tall and you met a tribe who was all six feet tall, how would you describe them? You would of course call them 'giants'. Enough silliness about "scripture says..". Until you have the evidence - and not just claims as above - then you are effectively posting nonnsense.There is no evidence to suggest that people we would now call "giants" ever existed, and much to suggest that any historical acccounts were due simple to one set of people being much taller than another group, as detailed below. Various claims have been made, but all are completely devoid of support from fields such as archaeology, and no evidence has ever been provided to back them up.Many myths do abound, but this is certainly due to ethnic interaction: a group of people who are all five feet tall meet a tribe of people who are all six feet tall. What else would you expect to call that taller tribe, except giants?As with all myths, the tale grows in the telling - exaggeration and embellishment are added as each generation passes on the story, made easier by the tradition of oral record, and of course there is no 'original' to compare these stories with.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"...Lovelock giant skull confirmed by museum!In 1911 several giant skeletons and ancient artefacts were supposedly fund in a cave in Lovelock in Nevada, USA. Almost everything was later lost in a fire but a skull is supposed to be found in the Humbolt Museum, Winnemucca. I send a request to the museum- and they could confirm that they indeed do have a Lovelock-skull there!When mining for guano in a cave in Lovelock, a small town about 80 miles north-east of Reno, the miners reportedly found mummies preserved in the dry bat-droppings. The mummies were large, from 6 and a half feet to more that 8 feet (2 to more than 2,5 meters), and they had red hair. They were reportedly lying in a layer of burnt material about four feet under the surface and there were also lots of broken arrows around the mummies. Before archaeologists could survey the findings most of it was gone or damaged - and a later fire where the artefacts were stored did no good either.LegendsThe Puite Indians of the area have legends about giants and how they killed them. The race of giants, the "Si-Te-Cah" , should have been white, red-haired, very tall cannibals, and the Indians started war against them when they entered their land. A coalition of tribes managed to trap the last remaining giants in a cave and while shooting arrows at them they started a large fire at the mouth of the cave. They kept the fire going and shot everybody who tried to get out - until the giants were annihilated.Dental modelOne person that can tell, and show us, how large the skulls are is Stan Nielsen, he went to find the cave and the skull in the museum:"Prior to a subsequent trip to the area, I borrowed a full-sized plaster dental model of the lower teeth of a normal modern adult from a friend, who was also my dentist. I took the plaster model with me when I next visited the area, in the hopes that I would be able to compare it with the jaw from one of the "giants." As I had hoped, the curator at the Winnemucca museum graciously allowed me to compare the plaster model with the jaw from the skull of one of the "giants" in the museum's collection. She placed the jaw down on her desk. I was allowed to place my plaster adult jaw next to jaw from the skull for purposes of comparison. The plaster model was much smaller than the jaw from the skull. In fact, the teeth of the jaw from the skull were almost twice the size of those of my plaster model. There were other factors, too, that distinguished it from today's humans."Other skeletonsOther giant skeletons have reportedly been found in the area, in 1931 and 1936 - and even a skeleton measuring 8 feet 9 inches was supposedly found in 1965, buried under a rock ledge along the Holly Creek in east-central Kentucky. All that is left today, as far as we know, are the skull and the scull parts in the tiny Humbolt Museum (and I am afraid they suddenly will be gone one day). The sensational artefacts are, believe it or not, kept in the backroom, but reports are telling that the staff will gladly show them to you if you inquire about them!Giant skulls:From: Humboldt County Museum [mailto:museum@winnemucca.net]Sent: 1. May 2008 03:20To: terje@sydhav.noRegarding: Lovelock SkullsDear Terry:We do, in fact, have one of the Lovelock skulls. It was obtained years ago as part of a local collection.Sorry about the delay!Barbara Powell Humboldt Musuem."By Ian Robst(6) On August 3, 2010 at 4:40 pm User:Ian_robst[0] said:I correct my self and say that I use the term nine feet at the top of the main paragraph and eight feet nearing the end of that same paragraph.By Ian Robst(5) On August 3, 2010 at 4:01 pm User:Ian_robst[0] said:To any and all who has ears to listen and eyes to see? If you have ever found giant bones take picture of them and call in journalists to help you catalogue. Also call university proffesers to help and catalouge.And use if needed scripture to refference geographic areas if you wish to mount an expidition. Lets find out together imagin if we found one toghter Nij what would you say then?? I say this to anyone including Nij who wishes to explore inorder to find a giant skelleton...may be finding the finances to start up an expidition would be a good idea. Lets pick an indepent crew and go and take a look see????? What you think Nij you up for it???By Ian Robst(4) On August 3, 2010 at 3:34 pm User:Ian_robst[0] said:A reply for Nij and no foul mouth it's not called for; Did Giants exsist yes for sure if you don't believe in God that's fine we will leave scripture out of the equation. Wiki "9 palms = 36 digits, i.e. ~67.5 cm or 27 inches (2.25 ft)" that's almost three feet would'nt you say Nij?(operated by Kent Hovind) has a "Creation Museum" displaying what is claimed to be a "thigh bone from the 13 foot man" (right [1]). The bone is leaning against the right side of the case.This bone can also be seen in Hovind's Creation Seminar Series as either a direct reference and/or a permanent set .enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Upon which I said 8 feet not nine the evidence is there if you look also testimonies of those who found the bones. Like the one of the U.S.A.F. piolt who flew out a dead giant from Afghanistan!! Look that one up as well penagon went mad with him. Why? you do the home work on that one as I already have that's what makes research fun and educating.I never said evidence was destroyed before tested read the the page again Nij. At the end of the page I mention that it needs futher looking at which means unbias attitude not attitude!Eaither one or two thing are taking place 1.either testimonies from those who claim to have giant bones and skelletons at hand to show are not true? 2. All and I mean every singal picture of giant bones are also not true? Is that possible???There's not a big difference from 5 feet to 6 feet but from 6 feet to 12 or 13 feet is a big difference. One or two feet is not much and not giant size. All aphebet agencies have an ejender to hide the facts from you! You say no...then do the research I beg to differ. wont to know more on giants go to steve {Quayle.com} and {coast to coast with Steve Quayle}. Wont to know more on ajenders go to {Alex Jones prison Planet.com and infow wars.com}(BY Ian Robst...many see giant's as nothing more than myth! Truth is with out dout skeleton's ranging from nine feet to thirtysix feet tall have been found. That is to say found and hidden away very quikly in the dark depths of museum's never to see the light of day again. What would that reason be? Well if one looks at the evolution chart we see monkey turning into modern man; but no giant man. The evolution chart goes through to modern man which is around six feet tall and so the evolutionists wish not to go down the route of giant's who did in fact once inhabbit the earth. One of the reasons for this is the God question! A question that has been fought against since Europe started its renaissance! The creator and the creation vs evolution. Sadly those who see evlotion as the standerd norm become short sighted as to the many wonder's that the earth spews back at modern man; it's as if the earth is saying to us "see what did once exist a long time ago." If all these skeletons of giant's were in fact gathered in one place for observation then i think without question the evolutionists would have to totally re-think evolution especially when giant skulls have been found and catalogued. Sadley it seems as if others have an ajender such as faking photo's of giant skeleton's being dug up and put on the internent. This is what spoils the truth of what is really being dug up, it seems that every time a giant skelleton is dug up someone comes along and says it's a fake, an independent observer is needed to make sure that what is coming out of the ground is verified and catalogued. Reporters and the ilk would also be a good idea. It has been said that the Mound Biulders of North America were recorded to be eight feet or more a fact the Smithsonian museum keeps under lock and key. According to Muslim tradition Adam was sixty cubits tall that is to say Adam was one hundered and eighty feet tall as there is three feet to a cubit. In places such as Ad and Thamud the people living there where also giant's. There is enough information in scripture and old documents to mount an expedition to these place and start digging the results of wich may be interesting! I guess that may never happen i would be afraid that bisa may creep in and the expedition would come to a halt. Without doubt there is much that needs too be looked at.
