A knight would often be a vassal of a more powerful noble, or subsidiary to the noble in another way.A powerful noble could also hold a knighthood himself.
A Lord was a powerful noble
He was not a noble. Knights were always nobility.
With respect since they were all of noble birth.
Since the squire was a young noble boy he went to another knight to be taught.
At about 7 years old a noble boy went to train with a knight and spent his life in training until at 21 years old he became a knight.
the knights were always soo good at building and the nobles used their building skills to kill them and take their slaves
A knight was a noble so he had all the rights and privileges that was with being a noble.
le chevalier noble = the noble knight
the answer to the noble knight able to see the holy grail will be Galahad
A Lord was a powerful noble
No, he is not noble.
They were nobility too and to become a knight a boy was sent to another noble family at age 7 and was trained. He became a knight at 21. A knight swore loyalty to the king and that he would give his life to protect him.
If you mean as a knight the noble boy was made a knight at 21.
he was a noble man hope this helped :)
They were nobility too and to become a knight a boy was sent to another noble family at age 7 and was trained. He became a knight at 21. A knight swore loyalty to the king and that he would give his life to protect him.
The noble knight never neglected his duties.
jousting was typically between two knights