answersLogoWhite

0

After revolutions, leaders who often take over are typically charismatic figures who can galvanize popular support, often emerging from revolutionary movements themselves. They may be ideologically driven, representing radical changes or reformist agendas that resonate with the revolutionary goals. Additionally, military leaders or those with strong organizational skills may assume power, especially in cases where instability necessitates a strong hand to restore order. Ultimately, these leaders often face challenges in transitioning from revolutionary enthusiasm to effective governance.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What kind of leaders have authority over their people ina theocracy?

The Religous leaders or the Ayatollahs.


Where were revolutions taking place in the eighteenth century?

all over Europe


How were the causes of the American and French revolutions similar?

they all revolutionized over the economy


How many leaders were in rome?

There were over 1,000 leaders over the 1,200 years of the history of ancient Rome.


How many Leaders were there in rome?

There were over 1,000 leaders over the 1,200 years of the history of ancient Rome.


What kind of empire did American leaders want to build?

They wanted American products in foreign markets, not American flags flying over colonies overseas :)


What was the overarching similarities of the three revolutions?

The overarching similarities among the three revolutions—often referring to the American, French, and Haitian Revolutions—include a strong desire for liberty and equality, fueled by Enlightenment ideals. Each revolution challenged existing social hierarchies and sought to dismantle oppressive regimes, promoting the rights of individuals over the authority of monarchs. Additionally, these revolutions inspired and influenced one another, as revolutionary ideas spread across borders, highlighting a common struggle for self-determination and justice.


Which is reason democracy failed following most Latin American Revolutions?

Democracy often failed in Latin America following most revolutions due to a combination of factors, including weak political institutions, social inequality, and military interference. Many revolutionary leaders established authoritarian regimes, prioritizing stability over democratic governance. Additionally, the lack of widespread political participation and education hindered the development of a robust democratic culture. Economic challenges and external influences further destabilized nascent democracies, leading to a cycle of political turmoil and dictatorship.


Why were the church leaders often at odds with the European rulers?

Church leaders and European rulers often clashed over issues of power and authority. The Church wielded significant influence, both spiritually and politically, leading to tensions over governance and control of land and resources. Additionally, rulers sought to consolidate their power and assert their authority over religious matters, while church leaders aimed to maintain their autonomy and influence. This struggle for dominance frequently resulted in conflicts, such as the Investiture Controversy, where the appointment of bishops became a contentious issue between secular and ecclesiastical authorities.


Are leaders in Africa democratic?

Africa has over 50 countries. Most leaders in Africa are democratic.


How many black people were at the march on Washington?

it was over 800,000 black leaders. i was involved within the majority of that number. but it was over 800,000 black leaders


Do french people prefer revolutions over reforms?

they prefer neither they rather suck lollipops and drink beer