0
What else can I help you with?
Why did trench warfare develop on the Western Front but not on the Eastern Front?
Trench warfare developed on the Western Front during World War I due to the stalemate between the Allied and Central Powers, with both sides digging trenches for protection. On the Eastern Front, the vast open spaces and more fluid military tactics made trench warfare less practical.
How was it difficult to break stalemate in the war?
Breaking a stalemate in warfare was difficult because the technology that made this type of war impossible had yet to be invented. Eventually, the U.S. and Britain developed things like planes and tanks that made fighting war in the trenches suicidal.
Who built Medieval times weapons?
Better weapons were made by armorers. Blacksmiths made weapons, and peasants made weapons by putting agricultural tools like scythe blades and bill hooks on poles. Bowyers made bows, fletchers made arrows, and heavy weapons like catapults were made by engineers. The early cannons were sometimes made by bellfounders.
Where did ancient Romans find there weapons?
The Romans made their weapons.
What caused stalemate along the 38th parallel?
stalemate is 2 side an there equally matched an no one in able to move forward nor backwards ,this was bordered across the 38th parallel do to the invasion made to the north toward the south
Why was the Western front called a stalemate?
The Western Front is generally considered a stalemate because of Trench Warfare. The line separating Allied Territory and Entente territory did not move much at all during the whole war. This is because both sides stayed in their trenches and if they advanced, they were pushed back quickly
Why did trench warfare develop on the Western Front but not on the Eastern Front?
Trench warfare developed on the Western Front during World War I due to the stalemate between the Allied and Central Powers, with both sides digging trenches for protection. On the Eastern Front, the vast open spaces and more fluid military tactics made trench warfare less practical.
Why did they lauch the Anzac compaign?
The Gallipoli campaign was Winston Churchill's brainchild. It was supposed to be a diversion from the stalemate on the Western Front. The troops were supposed to force their way through to Constantinople (now known as Istanbul). I don't know whether after that they were supposed to flank the Germans on the Western Front, or just scare the Germans into submission. They never made it.
Why did attempts to break the stalemate on the western front generally fail?
During World War I, the war's Western Front turned into a stalemate after initial advances by the German forces for primarily one reason. That reason is this: defensive technologies and tactics in the early 20th century were more advanced than offensive technologies; thus, offensive breakthroughs were either not possible or, where achieved, could not be sustained at length. Significant victories could only be achieved where some external element (e.g., egregious leadership mistake, troop demoralization, lack of supply) occurred, but these did not occur on the Western Front until 1918.
Why did a stalemate occur on the western front?
A stalemate occurred on the Western Front during World War I due to a combination of advanced defensive technologies, such as machine guns and barbed wire, and the extensive trench systems that both sides established. These factors made it incredibly difficult for either side to achieve a decisive breakthrough. The sheer scale of artillery bombardments also led to high casualties without significant territorial gains. Consequently, the conflict devolved into a prolonged war of attrition, with neither side able to secure a clear advantage.
What machine caused a stalemate on the western front?
The machine that significantly contributed to the stalemate on the Western Front during World War I was the machine gun. Its ability to deliver rapid, sustained fire made it highly effective in defending trenches, leading to devastating casualties for attacking forces. This technological advantage, combined with the extensive trench systems, resulted in a deadlock where neither side could gain substantial ground, leading to prolonged and grueling battles. The presence of the machine gun fundamentally changed warfare tactics and contributed to the war's overall stagnation.
Using the map provided identify which border was the most aggressively contested. Explain why in two to three sentences.?
The border most aggressively contested was the Western Front. This border saw intense fighting during World War I, with both sides engaging in trench warfare and launching offensives to gain ground. The stalemate and high casualties experienced on the Western Front made it a focal point of fierce and prolonged conflict.
How did trenches lead to stalemate?
Trenches led to stalemate during World War I by creating a fortified defensive system that made it extremely difficult for either side to gain significant ground. The deep, well-constructed trenches provided soldiers with protection from enemy fire, while the use of machine guns and artillery made frontal assaults costly and often futile. As both sides dug in, they focused on holding their positions rather than advancing, resulting in prolonged periods of deadlock and little territorial change. This lack of mobility and the horrors of trench warfare contributed to the overall stalemate on the Western Front.
Where were world war 2 weapons made?
Factories run by the women as the men were on the front line fighting :)
Brest-Litovsk Treaty affect the fighting on the Western Front?
it made a cool thing
In 1952 what did the war become with little progress being made on either side?
A stalemate war. Neither side could advance, thus it was a stalemate.
What weapons were the Iroquois weapons made of?
the weapons were made of rock or copper XD
