answersLogoWhite

0

Article One of the United States Constitution ~ see related link below .

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What are the effects on the constitutional amendments?

In speaking about the US Constitution, the amendments in the Bill of Rights were meant to guarantee that the Federal government did nothing to subvert the rights of citizens and of the US States.


Describe the limited role of the federal government in the economy in the late 1800s?

The federal government did little to nothing to help people financially, because they didn't think it was their position to


What does the tenth amendment reserve?

The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution generally provides for states' rights. It says that any power not granted to the federal government belongs to the states, and to the people.


Did Alexander hamilton believe in a weak federal government?

No. None of the founding fathers wanted a strong federal Government. They set up a federal system that served the needs for defense and trade between states and nothing more. This was the framework that they felt would prevent another King situation like that of England at the time or the bloated Federal system we see today.


Why did the government need to regulate the settlement of western lands?

Management of U.S. territories is the responsibility of the federal government. The U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 states "The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State."

Related Questions

Who was the constitution established for?

The constitution was established for the Federal Government. It really has nothing to do with the people, and everything to do with what the Federal Government is allowed to do, and how it is set up.


Can the constitution be amended in such a manner so as to complete exclude any role for the national government of the US?

No. Nothing in a state constitution can over ride the federal constitution. There are specific things listed in the federal constitution that are limited only to the federal government.


What size of government does the Republicans party want?

They want a FEDERAL government of the minimum size - and cost - required to carry out the enumerated powers of the Constitution REALLY WELL, and to do nothing - and spend nothing - prohibited by the Constitution to federal government. They want state governments of the minimum size required to carry out the government functions the Constitution reserves to states: policing, education, health insurance regulation, criminal courts.


What does the US Constitution symbolize?

it symbolizes protection of both citizens and states from the tyrrany of the federal government.


What does the constitution say about marriage?

Amendment X states that powers not delegated in the Constitution are reserved to the states. This is why the Federal Government does not the power to intervene and it is up to individual states.


What are the effects on the constitutional amendments?

In speaking about the US Constitution, the amendments in the Bill of Rights were meant to guarantee that the Federal government did nothing to subvert the rights of citizens and of the US States.


What are the limitations to the federal government?

Nothing socal studies


How did the federal government influence the civil right movement?

nothing


In the absence of a written constitution by what means can the legal and other rules of the constitution be identified as constitutional?

The question answers itself. In the absence of a constitution, NOTHING can be identified as consititutional, because there IS no constitution.


List 3 matters which can be altered by federal government?

nothing hi boris


What stated that the states had the right to judge whether federal laws agreed withe constitution or not?

Nothing. They do not have this right.


What group wanted to ratify the constitution?

The two major factions were the Federalists and the anti-federalists. The Federalists argued in favor of a strong central government, one that would not have the weaknesses of the old Articles of Confederation, while the anti-federalists were all the people who were afraid that a strong federal government would trample on the freedoms and liberties of the citizens. According to the Federalists, the Constitution granted only a few specific powers to the Federal government, and the people wouldn't need to worry about the Federal government overstepping its authority and interfering with the liberties of the people. The anti-federalists worried that there was nothing in the Constitution to PREVENT the central government from usurping the authority of the people or of the several States. The Federalists compromised by agreeing to a Bill of Rights; specific guarantees that the Federal government could never violate. The anti-federalists agreed, and the Constitution was adopted with the Bill of Rights guaranteeing certain freedoms of the people and strict limits to the power of the Federal government. In the past 220 years, we have seen that the Federalists were terribly wrong, and that the anti-federalists were painfully right. The limits put in place by the Bill of Rights has been trampled, and the freedoms of the people have been usurped, and the "limits" on the powers of the Federal government have been routinely ignored. Senators and Representatives in the Federal government utterly ignore their Constitutional limits, and since the Constitution included no provisions for its own enforcement, there is nothing to stop power-hungry legislators from doing whatever they please.