Both Nazism and Fascism share in common a series of propositions.
Extreme Nationalism
Disdain for Socialism and Communism
Belief in a strong leader
Centralisation of Government
Control of Education
I rather doubt it. See, Hitler's NAZI (National Socialist) party were fascists, directly opposed to the communist movement. Giving workers a share in the means of production would have been a communist position, and so likely opposed by the Nazis.
Policies of empire-building in the Pacific
The KKK is an organization, the neo-nazi's are more of a movement. They probably share a lot of the same beliefs and members.
Charles Coughlin
If I am correct, many/most of the liberals in Germany were Communists. If so, the liberals were indeed a prime target of the Nazis. ___ However, you are quite mistaken. At no time did the liberals make common cause with the Communists. The liberals were supporters of democracy, which the Nazis detested. (Incidentally, this zest for regarding liberals as Communists is something that hardline right-wingers in the US share with the Nazis).
That the good of the nation was more important than individual concerns
I rather doubt it. See, Hitler's NAZI (National Socialist) party were fascists, directly opposed to the communist movement. Giving workers a share in the means of production would have been a communist position, and so likely opposed by the Nazis.
Hatred towards Obama, or other righteous men.
I rather doubt it. See, Hitler's NAZI (National Socialist) party were fascists, directly opposed to the communist movement. Giving workers a share in the means of production would have been a communist position, and so likely opposed by the Nazis.
withdraw share of government it is called disinvestment
They agreed that the Nazis and the soviets could share the war-torn Poland
DOMAIN...........domain A group of users, servers, and other resources that share account and security policies through a Windows Server 2003 or Server 2008 NOS
Policies of empire-building in the Pacific
The KKK is an organization, the neo-nazi's are more of a movement. They probably share a lot of the same beliefs and members.
It was a Marketing proposition, to counter the 2,000 year old "Chosen People" brand, which the Nazis were determined to eliminate as a threat to their culture and power. Positioning a competing brand requires the "seller" to create an acceptance by the prospect of a superior offering. You cannot take lead market-share otherwise. And to lead a nation you need lead "market"-share. Enough of the "market" accepted the proposition to allow the Nazis to take that share.
To provide a concise answer, I would need to know the specific speech you're referring to and the policies it reflects. Please share the details of the speech and the policies in question, and I'll be happy to help!
Both had policies of empire-building in the Pacific in the early 1900s.