Devastating with sustainable damage
WW2.
Considering all the things that could have gone wrong the Japanese were remarkably lucky at Pesarl Harbour; and probably could not have immagined a better outcome for their side.
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
The outcome was that the colinist won. The outcome was that the colinist won.
Korematsu v. United States
A. It defined and extended individual liberties.
It was a major Japanese victory.
They didn't influence the outcome of WW2. The outcome was influenced by productivity and firepower.
WW2.
The probability of getting any outcome is 100%.The probability of a specific outcome depends on the description of that outcome.Some outcomes are more probable. Some are less probable.
A brief description of how an office can be effectively organize to produce best possible outcome.
Millions of people were killed despite very little territory being gained or lost on either side.
During World War II, the immediate outcome of the Battle of Guadalcanal (August 1942 to February 1943) was the liberation of an island previously held by the Japanese and the securing of an airfield for forward-based warplanes. The longer-term outcome was the erection of yet another 'block' to the Japanese offensive, signaling a strategic turn in the war in the favor of the Allies.
Millions of people were killed despite very little European territory being gained or lost
An outcome variable is the dependent variable in a study that researchers measure to determine the effect of the independent variable(s). It represents the main result or effect that researchers are studying or trying to understand.
Which Japanese War? China 1894? Russia 1904? China 1933? Russia 1939 (Nomonhan Incident)? World War II (1941-45)?
well...participles are very important espacially if you are describing a place,were in it serves and it completes your description to predict an outcome..