The authors claim that the states possess the right to self-governance and to determine their own political and economic systems, especially in the context of the revolution. They argue that when a government becomes tyrannical or fails to protect the rights of its citizens, the states have the authority to alter or abolish that government. This right is rooted in the principles of liberty and justice, emphasizing the importance of the consent of the governed.
supporter of the deposed James II and his descendants in their claim to the British throne after the Revolution of 1688
yes
YesHowever, this wasn't ALL of the revolution. Some of the revolution was in the minds of people: whether to stay with people or leave. The American Revolution also includes the writing of the Declaration of Independence and other important things. The war was just a part that was necessary to claim independence from Great Britain's king, King George the 3rd.
um...i have no idea
um...i have no idea
The authors claim is not supported by strong evidence
You need to read it.
After the evidence for the synthesis claim
An author's claim is the main argument or point they are trying to prove in their writing. It is the central idea that the author is seeking to persuade the reader to accept. The claim is typically supported by evidence and reasoning throughout the text.
The Nations that had claim in Oregon was Great Britain and the United States.
He was the first President born as a citizen of the United States. Previous Presidents were born before the Revolution.
Causal Claim
If you surrender a whole life insurance policy, you may have to claim the money on your income tax. The IRS states the amount you receive that is above the amount paid for premiums is considered taxable.
supporter of the deposed James II and his descendants in their claim to the British throne after the Revolution of 1688
yes
Hedging language is used in writing to express uncertainty and caution, which can protect a claim from direct criticism by allowing authors to acknowledge potential counterarguments or limitations of their argument. It provides authors with a way to mitigate the risk of being proven wrong or facing strong opposition by not committing to a definitive stance. This language can help foster a more nuanced and balanced discussion by considering and addressing potential weaknesses in the argument.
Policy Claim or Claim of Policy(Apex)