answersLogoWhite

0

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

The rights that a Roman citizen did not have were mostly based upon custom and tradition. For example, an adult man, could not have his own house or own property unless his father released him because technically all property in a family belonged to the paterfamilia. A person of a lower class did not have the right to usurp any power or privilege that belonged to someone of a higher class.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?